FSA fines Nomura £1.75 million for mis-pricing

FSA headquarters

The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Japanese bank Nomura £1.75 million for operational risk failures leading to mis-pricing of volatility and correlation in its equity derivatives business.

"The systems and controls around marking the international equity derivatives books fell far short of those expected by the FSA for a business trading complex and high-risk financial products," the FSA states on its website. According to the FSA, a "large number" of these failures existed for a "prolonged period of time", while all of the failures existed from at least January to July 2008, across the product control and front-office teams in the business.

Nomura identified the shortcomings in June 2008 after discovering the mis-marking of volatility levels on a client-facing book within the international equity derivatives business. This resulted in a £10.8 million writedown. Following this incident, correlation marks across the books were reviewed, leading to a further writedown of £5.5 million.

The FSA judged Nomura had breached two FSA principles by not conducting its business with due care and diligence, and failing to have adequate risk management systems in place. Particular grievances included "significant failings" by the product control team in conducting the independent price verification of equity derivatives, and "inadequate trader supervision" in the equity derivatives front office in Hong Kong.

Nomura's internal audit also conducted an investigation into the matter and took disciplinary action against staff involved in the mis-marking. "We now consider the matter behind us," says a spokesperson for the bank.


Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Investment banks: the future of risk control

This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control

Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective

Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…

Emerging trends in op risk

Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…

Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk

How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…

Building resilience into ESG risk management

Risk and resilience continue to play an important role in the navigation of an increasingly uncertain world. Fusion Risk Management explores why it is equally crucial for technology to support organisations in addressing pertinent environmental, social…

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here