
UK regulator provides further insight on AMA use test

Regulators are continuing to hammer home their expectations surrounding the use test for the advanced measurement approach (AMA) for operational risk under Basel II. The UK Financial Services Authority has been a particular proponent of the test and it forms a key part in its AMA approval process.
Andrew Sheen, manager of operational risk policy at the UK regulator, provided further insight into the FSA's expectations during a recent presentation a conference in Rome on June 12 and 13. He said: "Firms often experience difficulties in determining whether they meet the use test as they fail to develop a robust structure against which they might measure their performance and effectiveness."
Sheen proposed that AMA firms could assess the way in which they have integrated their op risk measurement system using three components: the model inputs; the model outputs; and the various linkages connecting these elements, including governance, management reporting and risk tolerance. This approach can be easily adapted by firms using one of the simpler methodologies. Sheen added: "Even in instances where firms have succeeded in specifying the extent of the challenge, many have failed to fully judge how successful they have been. In some cases the assessment has been completed by the operational risk function itself, and it might be possible that sometimes the area is insufficiently independent to evaluate the true position."
In the FSA's view, compliance with the use test should be considered an ongoing requirement and one that firms will need to review and assess on a regular basis, particularly in view of changes to a number of variables including personnel, structure, products, processes and systems. As the firm strives to meet the use test by supporting and enhancing the management of operational risk within the organisation, it will need to be constantly revising its assessment of the way in which the operational risk framework is integrated into its day-today risk management process to keep pace with this evolution. Tony De Quintal, senior associate for operational risk policy in the FSA's wholesale and institutional markets division, said: "Firms with a dynamic, continually evolving framework, will be better placed for use test discussions with their regulator."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Power play: how geopolitics is shaping op risk at G-Sibs
Op Risk Benchmarking: Geopolitics is a top five fear for G-Sibs, but most banks lack specialist risk staff and classical tools
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
No tick-the-box approach to compliance risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs share fear of regulatory run-ins, but lack common stance on modelling, KRIs and more
Bread-and-butter op risks at the top table
Op Risk Benchmarking: As G-Sibs are forced to do more, how can they avoid doing more wrong?
Op Risk Benchmarking: Inside the G-Sibs
New initiative scrutinises op risk measurement and management practices at the world’s largest banks
Sizing cyber: banks split on who owns and measures hack threats
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs split on risk modelling and management for IT disruption and infosec
Banks frequently breach appetite for top op risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Five G-Sibs breached appetite in past year across four risk types, new research reveals
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control