
Flag-waving (not wavering)

Until recently, I have often made note of the fact that many European jurisdictions – notably the UK and Germany, as well as Italy – have moved much more aggressively towards implementing the advanced measurement approach than the US. More than once, that nation's efforts have felt the sharp side of my keyboard.
Our recent OpRisk USA conference in New York, however, made me want to start waving the old stars 'n' stripes – I was so impressed with what the speakers had to say. For the US has leapfrogged Europe in operational risk, in some ways by leapfrogging over op risk. In the US, there is far less talk about the technicalities of the AMA, which has come to be associated with regulatory compliance to Basel II. Instead, the focus in the US is on enterprise-wide risk management.
In the US, many firms – the ones engaged in the concept of op risk – are moving beyond Basel II to create a new philosophy of business, which incorporates risk management into senior executive decision-making. I think this may perhaps be because the Basel II process is stalled at the moment – despite the release of the notice of proposed rulemaking, it will probably be deep into the fourth quarter of 2006 before we see the next substantial pronouncement on the subject from regulators. I think this has forced firms, who are committed to op risk, to think much more carefully about the reasons why they feel this is such an important programme to implement.
Back in Europe, at our OpRisk Europe event in London in early April, regulators, from Spain's José-María Roldán, to the UK's Rosemary Hilary were expounding on the importance of taking op risk beyond regulatory compliance and into the realm of business strategy and tactics. It's a theme the US Fed's Susan Schmidt Bies has been speaking on for some time.
And I think it is a theme that firms will have to adopt as their own in Europe – and in Asia. I'll be curious to see what the speakers have to say at our first annual OpRisk Asia event, which is being held in Singapore in July.
Operational risk makes sense – and it is not just about Basel II compliance, it is about fraud, and business continuity. It's about corporate governance and insider trading. And beyond those things, it's about using risk management analysis to make better business decisions. Who doesn't want to, at the end of the day, make more money, with less risk? OR&C
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Power play: how geopolitics is shaping op risk at G-Sibs
Op Risk Benchmarking: Geopolitics is a top five fear for G-Sibs, but most banks lack specialist risk staff and classical tools
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
No tick-the-box approach to compliance risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs share fear of regulatory run-ins, but lack common stance on modelling, KRIs and more
Bread-and-butter op risks at the top table
Op Risk Benchmarking: As G-Sibs are forced to do more, how can they avoid doing more wrong?
Op Risk Benchmarking: Inside the G-Sibs
New initiative scrutinises op risk measurement and management practices at the world’s largest banks
Sizing cyber: banks split on who owns and measures hack threats
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs split on risk modelling and management for IT disruption and infosec
Banks frequently breach appetite for top op risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Five G-Sibs breached appetite in past year across four risk types, new research reveals
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control