Nasdaq calls for further amendments to Sox 404

Daily news headlines

Action needed to stop over-auditing

Nasdaq, the world’s largest electronic stock exchange, has called for further amendments to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's (PCAOB) new auditing standard for Sarbanes-Oxley (Sox) Section 404 compliance, claiming that recent concessions have not gone far enough.

In a statement released to mark the fifth anniversary of the passing of the contentious auditing law, Nasdaq acknowledged that “the benefits of the legislation have been proven – among them greater transparency, accountability and improved corporate governance,” but urged further revision of Section 404 to prevent over-auditing.

“Nasdaq believes incremental progress has been made to improve Section 404 via the PCAOB proposed Auditing Standard No. 5 (AS5). However, Nasdaq believes AS5 has not provided the needed clarity or the tools to alleviate the root cause of unnecessarily onerous and costly auditing processes,” the statement read.

AS5 and the related shift to principles-based Sox compliance by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) were implemented in reaction to vehement protests from US public companies and politicians that the 2002 Act went too far and has debilitated American commerce rather than strengthened it.

Nasdaq’s recommendations include:

- Changing the auditor's role to focus on evaluating the effectiveness of management's internal controls programme, rather than the effectiveness of individual controls.

- A clearer, more workable definition of materiality to assist management and auditors.

- Establishing an ombudsman office in the PCAOB to serve as an advocate for issuers who feel their internal controls are being over-audited.

- Establishing a clear policy against over-auditing including a fine schedule against auditors, if necessary.

- Allowing companies with no material weaknesses to perform the auditor portion of Section 404 in alternate years.

- Raising relief for smaller companies by focusing on ‘smaller’ companies, not just ‘smaller and less complex’ companies.

Given that it took four and a half years to convince the SEC and PCAOB to give the ground they have, it seems unlikely that any appetite exists for changes in the near future, although Nasdaq has one influential figure on its side.

"Good governance depends on good controls and bright line standards. While AS5 represents improvement over the previous standard, it does not go far enough to help decrease regulatory complexity and reduce the risk for overzealous auditing. We must take bolder steps to make our markets more attractive and competitive," said Michael Oxley, Nasdaq’s vice-chairman and co-author of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Financial crime and compliance50 2024

The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector

Investment banks: the future of risk control

This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control

Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective

Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…

Emerging trends in op risk

Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…

Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk

How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…

Building resilience into ESG risk management

Risk and resilience continue to play an important role in the navigation of an increasingly uncertain world. Fusion Risk Management explores why it is equally crucial for technology to support organisations in addressing pertinent environmental, social…

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here