
Counterparty risk growing threat to global market, says study
Daily news headlines
STAMFORD, CT – Counterparty risk from credit default swaps (CDS) is seen as a serious threat to global financial markets, according to three quarters of institutions participating in new research by Greenwich Associates.
In the wake of the near collapse of Bear Stearns and its Fed-engineered buyout by rival JP Morgan, the study revealed almost 60% of respondents thought another large financial services firm would collapse within the next six months, and a further 15% within the next 12 months.
The survey relied on North American and European financial institutions, and found that more sophisticated investors were slightly more optimistic than other investors, but the overall picture was still pessimistic.
Greenwich Associates consultant Frank Feenstra says: “Only 27% of the institutions think there will not be another casualty along the lines of Bear Stearns. If you are looking for a silver lining in these findings, it seems that most institutions think we are currently in the most dangerous period for global financial services firms. Perhaps if the markets can make it through the next six months, the level of pessimism may begin to subside.”
Firms have also turned away from CDS, with 62% of fixed-income survey participants that employ the swaps saying increased counterparty risk has caused them to reduce their use.
Almost 80% of participants said their banks have tightened margin or collateral requirements since the outbreak of the global credit crunch, especially those hit hardest by illiquidity and writedowns of bad subprime debt. Over a quarter of institutions said their trading activities had been lessened by the market austerity.
Concerns about counterparty risk have caused institutions to cut back on their use of CDS. Among fixed-income survey participants that employ CDS, 62% say increased counterparty risk has caused them to limit their use. For 70% of respondents, their main way of reducing counterparty risk was to trade only with the banks and broker dealers considered most financially sound.
There were also strong indications of support for centralised clearing systems for CDS, especially strong from hedge funds and continental European institutions. In particular, seven out of 10 hedge funds said they would rather use a clearing entity operated by an exchange than one operated by banks.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control
Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective
Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…
Emerging trends in op risk
Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…
Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk
How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…
Building resilience into ESG risk management
Risk and resilience continue to play an important role in the navigation of an increasingly uncertain world. Fusion Risk Management explores why it is equally crucial for technology to support organisations in addressing pertinent environmental, social…
Operational resilience: charting evolution, strengthening impact
Arming a business in preparation for robust operational resilience measures is not a one-step solution – it continues to evolve. The key to strengthening defences against all events – especially the unlikely but plausible – is to build business agility…
Operational resilience – Driving excellence and effective measurement in financial services
This webinar explores how to build resilience across an organisation, discussing actions and measures companies are currently taking to become more agile, adaptable and able to future-proof their business growth
Unlocking the potential of a firm-wide and systematic approach to operational resilience
This webinar explores best practices in response to regulatory policy and supervisory guidance, offering practical approaches to achieve a mature and robust operational resilience programme