
Mifid a failure say some traders
Daily news headlines
LONDON – The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has met with traders and investment banks this week to discuss concerns that the introduction of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, which came into force on November 1, 2007, has caused UK equity trading to become less transparent – the exact opposite to what the directive intended.
According to Financial News, the Investment Management Association (IMA), which represents UK find managers, called a meeting with the FSA to discuss a lack of consistency in how trades are being reported. Representatives from the London Stock Exchange, Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters and trade reporting service provider Boat also attended the meeting.
The introduction of Mifid, traders argue, has led to a fragmentation of market data. Because equity trades can now be published in several different locations, they are also being published in several different formats. This has made is difficult for existing analytics, including transaction cost analysis and best execution verification, to be able to operate effectively, according to the IMA in a letter to the FSA after the meeting. This has also led to a rise in some market participants exploiting the new rules to hide larger trades, with London trades emerging on eastern European exchanges that are less likely to be noticed by the competition.
Through its dialogue with the FSA, the IMA is seeking to establish clear guidelines that determine how trades should be reported, because Mifid does not identify a standard set of rules for data reporting. The IMA is hoping regulators will rule on this, but the FSA and other regulators could be unwilling to do so in the push for greater self-regulation, and many would want the industry to come up with a solution instead. The IMA has proposed that a market transparency group be set up to identify areas where a UK approach to trade reporting is required.
The European Commission is due to launch a two-year investigation into the issue surrounding data reporting soon.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control
Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective
Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…
Emerging trends in op risk
Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…
Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk
How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…
Building resilience into ESG risk management
Risk and resilience continue to play an important role in the navigation of an increasingly uncertain world. Fusion Risk Management explores why it is equally crucial for technology to support organisations in addressing pertinent environmental, social…
Operational resilience: charting evolution, strengthening impact
Arming a business in preparation for robust operational resilience measures is not a one-step solution – it continues to evolve. The key to strengthening defences against all events – especially the unlikely but plausible – is to build business agility…
Operational resilience – Driving excellence and effective measurement in financial services
This webinar explores how to build resilience across an organisation, discussing actions and measures companies are currently taking to become more agile, adaptable and able to future-proof their business growth
Unlocking the potential of a firm-wide and systematic approach to operational resilience
This webinar explores best practices in response to regulatory policy and supervisory guidance, offering practical approaches to achieve a mature and robust operational resilience programme