
So, what else is new?
Editor's Letter

I laughed like a drain when I heard about Paul Moore, the Cassandra of HBOS. All the breathless media coverage in the UK - oh my goodness, nobody on the board or in senior management listened to the risk manager, how could that be? - veered from the ridiculous to the sublime.
Most operational risk managers have had to cope with this collective deafness at the top of their organisations for years. At a panel discussion last November, 'Delivering GRC to the board' (posted on the OR&C website), participants talked about their frustration with the way reports get 'cleansed' before they are passed on up the organisation. The consensus seemed to be that board reports about risk management are pretty sanitised.
Nobody wants to deliver bad news. Let's be honest - whistleblowers are inevitably portrayed as noble but slightly nutty. Paul Moore himself was treated to some fairly robust spin and insinuation in the media. People who point out problems are branded 'difficult personalities' who 'aren't team players' and 'didn't get along with their colleagues'.
Again, hearty laughter from this quarter. Of course these attributes apply to most whistleblowers. In the environment for truth-telling that existed up until now, who but someone that was very individualistic and not afraid of being isolated by their colleagues would even bother to point out potential problems? Most of the time, if the whistleblower isn't pushed out of the organisation, they know they will have to jump when they do speak their mind.
In a perfect world, these individualists who don't quite fit in to corporate politics would be seen as valuable additions to the corporate mix of personalities and valued for their insights. Concerns about the way businesses are being run or the way individuals are behaving would be swiftly passed up the organisational communication chain, heard by management and the board with interest, and acted upon.
This is really the place that financial institutions need to strive to get to. Certainly, there are technology tools out there that can help firms achieve better communication and more transparency regarding the risks they face. But at the end of the day, all technology can be fiddled with to produce the desired result. It's the organisations themselves that need to change - from the tone at the top all the way through to the front line. Speaking out needs to be visibly rewarded - creativity and perception must be nurtured.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Power play: how geopolitics is shaping op risk at G-Sibs
Op Risk Benchmarking: Geopolitics is a top five fear for G-Sibs, but most banks lack specialist risk staff and classical tools
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
No tick-the-box approach to compliance risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs share fear of regulatory run-ins, but lack common stance on modelling, KRIs and more
Bread-and-butter op risks at the top table
Op Risk Benchmarking: As G-Sibs are forced to do more, how can they avoid doing more wrong?
Op Risk Benchmarking: Inside the G-Sibs
New initiative scrutinises op risk measurement and management practices at the world’s largest banks
Sizing cyber: banks split on who owns and measures hack threats
Op Risk Benchmarking: G-Sibs split on risk modelling and management for IT disruption and infosec
Banks frequently breach appetite for top op risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Five G-Sibs breached appetite in past year across four risk types, new research reveals
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control