Risk.net poll: Industry divided over plan to scrap VAR


A poll of Risk.net readers shows a sharp divide over the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's proposal to use expected shortfall to calculate trading book capital requirements, instead of the long-standing value-at-risk metric.

The poll asked readers if they agreed with the proposal, and the 992 respondents were split almost evenly: 54% were in favour, with 46% against.

VAR has attracted public criticism because it is seen as neglecting the unlikeliest events, allowing firms – and investors

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: