Skip to main content

Being stressed is good for you

Increased regulatory focus means stress testing can no longer play a minor role in banks’ strategic thinking and capital considerations. Many institutions require cultural and procedural change to make this happen, but are they capable of bringing it about? By Jonathan Hawkins

maarten-gelderman
Maarten Gelderman, De Nederlandsche Bank

The financial crisis highlighted numerous failings in risk management. Regulators argue that senior management was over-reliant on certain metrics such as value-at-risk, and failed to appreciate the limitations of the approach - specifically, that it did not capture low probability but high-impact events at the tail of the distribution. Banks are now being pushed to address this blind spot by

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here