From VAR to stress testing

The authorised use of internal value-at-risk models for calculating regulatory capital was a major advance in bank supervision. It was accompanied by a drive towards best-practice risk methods as the supervisory benchmark. While we didn't fully realise it at the time, this effectively replaced sluggish advances in prescriptive regulation with far more dynamic competition over what constitutes best practice among banks.

At the same time, however, the Basel Committee's decision set off a major

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: