Basel triggers new tussle on anti-Archegos rules

Critics argue new guidelines on counterparty credit risk are either unworkable, or don’t go far enough to tackle concentration and wrong-way risk

All the prime brokers who served highly leveraged family office Archegos Capital Management prior to its collapse in March 2021 complied with prudential rules around counterparty credit risk. And yet between them, the banks lost more than $10 billion. And for Credit Suisse, which accounted for around half the total losses, the debacle arguably marked the beginning of a slide into crisis, and its takeover by UBS two years later.

Little wonder the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is now

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here