Banks relieved as EBA punts on dual-track stress tests
Hybrid approach for 2023 will see top-down models used to project net fee and commission income only
European banks breathed a sigh of relief last month after the European Banking Authority backed away from a long-mooted split structure for its 2023 stress tests, opting instead for a hybrid approach.
Reforms proposed by the EBA in 2020 would have divided the biennial stress test into two parts: a bottom-up leg, where banks use internal models to gauge how they would perform in pre-set stress
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: EFG takes a bath for two decades of money laundering
Also: Deepfake voice clone cons Intesa division; key couple of cryptocurrency hacks. Data by ORX News
Managing risk to accelerate agentic AI value creation
Banks can accelerate agentic AI adoption by aligning each use case’s risks, controls and capabilities, enabling safe, accountable and value-driven deployment
One legal entity. Multiple IDs. Three business risks.
How fragmented entity IDs undermine risk, compliance and revenue decisions
An agentic bank? Not so fast
With no clear definition or way to gauge ROI, claims of AI adoption should be taken with a pinch of salt
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment
For enterprise risk, influence runs deeper than any veto
Risk Benchmarking study finds formal veto rights concentrated among the largest lenders, but used only as a last resort
Intraday pricing: fixed income’s next frontier
With firms looking to price fixed income securities on an intraday basis, specialist pricing providers such as LSEG help address cost, complexity and time-to-market challenges
Tech and data fragmentation irks enterprise risk managers
Risk Benchmarking: Often at the mercy of decisions made by other parts of the bank, ERM heads gripe at disparate systems, poor UX and reporting gaps
