
Nasdaq held Aas portfolio for nine months after blow-up
Swedish regulator reveals CCP’s decision to keep defaulted power portfolio – and claims it was not fully hedged

Nasdaq Clearing did not offload the portfolio of defaulted power trader Einar Aas until June 2019 – more than nine months after an auction took place to sell the positions – according to an investigation of the default by the Swedish financial regulator. At the time of the auction, the clearing house asserted the portfolio had been “closed out”.
It now appears that after a first attempt to auction off the book failed, the central counterparty (CCP) used a second auction to obtain hedges for
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]
More on Risk management
Regulation
EU banks fret over mismatches on ESG disclosure rules
Different timelines for banks and their clients could stymie comparisons between banks
Receive this by email