Skip to main content

Staff, survival days, models – where banks split on ALM

Liquidity and rate risks are as old as banking; but the 46 banks in our benchmarking study have different ways to manage them

This piece is part of a series benchmarking bank ALM practices. Risk Management subscribers can view selected cuts of the underlying data here.

The need to match and manage assets and liabilities is so foundational for banks that you might expect each lender to do it in roughly the same way. And they do – roughly.

But while they all have broadly the same basic risks, each bank has its own product

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

Show password
Hide password

ALM Benchmarking: explore the data

View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 46-bank study, covering ALM governance, balance-sheet strategy, stress-testing, technology and regulation

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here