
Pandemic volatility – How it is affecting collateral management

Ed Corral, global head of collateral strategy at J.P. Morgan, explores the impact of the delay to uncleared margin rules phases five and six, and how this will play out alongside the delay to the aggregate average notional amount, as well as the extent to which recent volatility in the market caused by the Covid‑19 pandemic will influence firms’ choice of initial margin (IM) models
Was the delay to implementation phases five and six of the uncleared margin rules necessary? What impact is it having on firms’ preparations?

Ed Corral: While our preparations were on track to meet the original deadline, from an industry perspective, the delay was certainly welcome. Considering that the IM calculation and reconciliation processes are brand new for buy-side firms, the additional time granted by the delay will provide an opportunity for them to dig deeper into the nuances of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association’s standard IM model (Simm) versus getting ready for IM (Grid) for specific product types. They can also use this time to refine the workflows built around the reconciliation process and take advantage of the prolonged testing period. All of this should naturally translate into a smoother go-live – especially for phase five firms.
The aggregate average notional amount (AANA) calculation window has also been deferred by a year, potentially creating a new bottleneck before the phase five deadline – to what extent is this a missed opportunity?
Ed Corral: Most buy-side firms already have a good understanding of the size of their derivatives books and have already made a preliminary determination on whether they will be in scope for phases five or six. Delaying the AANA calculation window shouldn’t impact participants’ go-live readiness.
How is the need to post regulatory IM affecting firms’ trading strategies and product choices? Which instruments are most likely to be pushed into the cleared world as a result of phase five implementation?
Ed Corral: Firms have become even more keenly aware of the ancillary costs associated with the in-scope trades. Commenting on which instruments will be pushed into the cleared world at this juncture would be speculative. However, to the extent possible, participants will hold on to their long‑dated (pre‑regulatory deadline) trades and steer away from any material changes to avoid making legacy trades in scope for segregation of IM and trigger the additional costs.
What tactics are firms employing to drive efficiency in exchange threshold monitoring and optimisation?
Ed Corral: As buy-side participants start to become familiar with Simm and Grid calculation methodologies, margin analytics capabilities are coming to the forefront. The decision around where to put on a new trade – for example, cleared versus bilateral, and which counterparty or central counterparty – will heavily consider the required IM amount. The buy-side’s front office will need the required tools to make the right decision.
To what extent will the recent market volatility influence firms’ choice of IM models?
Ed Corral: It still depends on the make-up of a particular firm’s portfolio. The heightened volatility has driven a corresponding increase in required margin. This, in turn, has sharpened all firms’ focus on the most efficient model for their portfolio. While Grid does not allow for offsetting risks and is generally regarded as the more conservative methodology, anecdotally, some buy-side firms have made their own independent determination based on the composition of their overall portfolios.
How are firms’ approaches to collateral management likely to change in light of recent events?
Ed Corral: Collateral management continues its journey from a back-office function to a value-generating front-office one. Recent events only speed this transition and highlight the importance of effective collateral management from a cost management/avoidance point of view. Further to recent market volatility, a number of previously ‘dormant’ high-threshold credit support annexes have turned active and exchanged margin for the first time. This has increased firms’ overall collateral requirement, thus creating further stress on those firms’ overall liquidity.
Ed Corral’s responses are in a personal capacity, and the views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect or represent the views of J.P. Morgan
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Investing in operational readiness to optimise FRTB capital
A forum of industry experts discusses the implementation of FRTB, the burden of investment into data and infrastructure for FRTB compliance, the considerations for banks in using the standardised approach (SA) and the internal model approach (IMA)
Top 10 operational risks: The umpire strikes back
Tougher regulatory enforcement, new consumer rules and rise of ESG are ringing alarm bells
Ion wasn’t deemed a ‘critical’ vendor by most clients
Software firm escaped heavy scrutiny ahead of cyber attack, says US Treasury official
Op risk data: Stanford fraud haunts banks for billions
Also: Helaba’s crank capital relief; TSE stock price sanction; 1MDB mauls Mudabala. Data by ORX News
Hacked off: banks demand answers after Ion cyber attack
Clients left in the dark about ransomware attack that disrupted futures trading last month
Digital exposure makes fraud management a vital responsibility for financial institutions
Fraud management and detection continue to be an increasing area of concern for financial institutions worldwide
UBS takeover of Credit Suisse to trigger higher G-Sib surcharge
At 14.2%, UBS’s CET1 capital ratio is more than sufficient to absorb the deal
Nasdaq exec criticises VAR models in erratic energy markets
FIA Boca 2023: Model being adopted by rivals is “bad choice” for unpredictable assets, says exchange tech official