CECL muddies stress tests for US banks

Accounting forecasts differ from Fed’s CCAR scenarios; banks seek middle way to avoid upfront capital hit


Sometimes perfect foresight is not a desirable quality. For US banks updating their annual stress tests to include new accounting practices, many are relying on so-called “imperfect foresight” to gauge credit losses.

Starting from this year, US banks must incorporate Current Expected Credit Loss accounting estimates into their stress test outputs. But the economic scenarios that banks use to determine lifetime credit losses under CECL are different from those used by the Federal Reserve in its

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: