Banks demand greater scrutiny of CCP margin add-ons

Nasdaq Clearing blow-up prompts questions over CCPs’ methods of applying top-ups to concentrated positions

Nasdaq
Photo: PA

More should be done to ensure margin concentration add-ons are calculated appropriately by central counterparties (CCPs) – perhaps with the involvement of regulators – say market participants, following hefty losses at Nasdaq Clearing on a position that was not deemed concentrated enough to warrant a margin top-up.

In September, Nasdaq Clearing members were left mopping up losses of €107 million ($122.0 million) when spread trades put on by Norwegian power market trader Einar Aas blew up

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: