‘Cover 2’ CCP reserve standard inadequate – study

Stress tests underestimate how twin member failure affects clearing house stability

Researchers say “Cover 2” fails to account for the network effects of a twin default

False assumptions about how crises spread mean that default funds in many clearing houses could be insufficient to protect against contagion during periods of extreme stress, new research claims.

Large clearing houses are supposed to hold resources capable of absorbing the simultaneous default of their two largest members. But this standard, known as “Cover 2”, fails to account for the likely impact of a twin default on the network of interbank exposures, weakening other clearing members and

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: