Quants tout improved expected shortfall backtest

Measure aims to provide better gauge of VAR violations

Dollar test

A new paper by a group of quants advocates a revised backtest for expected shortfall (ES) models – one that could offer banks with large trading operations a more accurate view of aggregate risk across desks, and, they hope, could be of interest for regulators when gauging aggregate risk across the financial system.

While value-at-risk has been banks’ standard gauge for market risk for many years, expected shortfall – also known as conditional VAR – has risen to prominence since the crisis

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

If you already have an account, please sign in here.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: