Quants tout improved expected shortfall backtest

Tweet
Facebook
LinkedIn
Save this article
Send to
Print this page

A new paper by a group of quants advocates a revised backtest for expected shortfall (ES) models – one that could offer banks with large trading operations a more accurate view of aggregate risk across desks, and, they hope, could be of interest for regulators when gauging aggregate risk across the financial system.

While value-at-risk has been banks’ standard gauge for market risk for many years, expected shortfall – also known as conditional VAR – has risen to prominence since the crisis

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]

You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/

If you would like to purchase additional rights please email [email protected]