FRTB standardised approach threatens commodity hedging

Basel language would force unnatural treatment of offsetting positions

Oil pipes
A strict interpretation of the Basel text would increase cost of hedging commodity positions

Hedged commodity positions could incur outsized regulatory capital charges under the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s new market risk framework because of the problematic wording of a critical rule that governs how banks assess their commodity exposures.

The market risk rules – known as the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) – permit dealers to calculate their capital requirements using their own internal models or through a revised, standardised sensitivities-based approach

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: