The problems with conduct risk loss aggregation

Aggregation of conduct risk losses is recommended practice, but it can seriously distort capital calculations

Pile of crates
Collection time: grouping together loss events can be hazardous

Peter Mitic is the UK head of operational risk methodology at Santander

When a large number of very small losses, such as conduct risk loss events, are aggregated into a small number of very large losses, modelling regulatory capital becomes difficult. Capital models attempt to assign a severity distribution and the frequency distribution to empirical data. In practice, the traditional severity distributions have been “fat-tailed”. These distributions are useful for modelling a small number of

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

To continue reading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: