
OpRisk North America: on AMA, cyber and the role of op risk
Basel Committee’s controversial proposal on op risk modelling spurs debate at US event

This year's OpRisk North America conference heard passionate and often heated discussion about regulation, op risk modelling, cyber risk and the role of op risk managers within the business.
A particular focus of the event, held on March 15–16 in New York, was a January proposal by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to remove the advanced measurement approach to op risk, preventing banks from using their own internal models. While many banks criticised the move, some senior US regulators sought to defend the Basel Committee's position.
To read more, please click on the articles below.
Op risk models still needed despite SMA, says regulator
Models “play an important role in quantifying risk”, says OCC's Beth Dugan
Dump jargon and engage with business, op risk managers told
Operational risk urged to assume bigger role in strategic and HR decisions
Conference hears fierce criticism of Basel op risk plans
Op risk professionals pour scorn on SMA charge, but some bank experts speak out in favour
Op risk managers must be ‘change agents’, says Fed official
Fed's Gwendolyn Collins calls on op risk managers to be pioneers, not policemen
Cyber threats forcing business continuity overhaul
Communications need close attention when firms are attacked, conference hears
US DoJ reverses policy of withholding cyber-attack intelligence
Law enforcement failed to warn Heartland of 2009 security breach, says FS-Isac’s Nelson
Photogallery: OpRisk North America 2016
Free-to-view photographs from OpRisk North America 2016
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Top 10 op risks: cyber still top but change management surges
AI-enhanced threats permeate this year’s top operational risks for financial firms, from infosec to geopolitics
Industry fears Emir 3.0 fast model approval will cause delays
More model changes could be caught by proposed criteria for defining significance
NSCC liquidity shortfalls raise T+1 concerns
Lagging FX settlement processes could become a problem for clearing houses
Basis traders mull UST self-clearing as response to SEC mandate
Inter-affiliate exemption requested by hedge funds could ease shortage of clearing capacity
Fed’s NBFI scenario may be more use than CCAR – experts
Main severely adverse scenario does not capture contagion risks from any squeeze on non-banks
Auto-encoding term-structure models
An arbitrage-free low-dimensionality interest rate model is presented
Configuration and control: next-level risk analytics for alternative assets
The evolving needs of traditional and alternative asset industries, including the transformative impact of advanced data analytics and model training within new customisable frameworks
CCP models vulnerable to Trump risk
Volatility of ‘will he, won’t he’ tariff strategy could confound clearing house risk models