Success in Fed stress tests comes with a cost
A number of apparently robust banks failed the US stress tests in March because of qualitative issues – in short, the Fed did not trust the numbers. This could be an ongoing problem for the industry, which is struggling to meet supervisory demands on risk and IT. Joe Rennison reports
For the five banks that failed the latest iteration of the Federal Reserve Board's annual stress tests, the March 26 results were the start of a race to improve and then resubmit capital plans. For the 25 banks that passed, it would be easy, but wrong, to conclude the heat is off. While these institutions are free to make their proposed dividend payments or share buybacks, some are also under pressure to head off future problems.
The Fed doesn't say much about these institutions. The stress test
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
NSCC liquidity shortfalls raise T+1 concerns
Lagging FX settlement processes could become a problem for clearing houses
Basis traders mull UST self-clearing as response to SEC mandate
Inter-affiliate exemption requested by hedge funds could ease shortage of clearing capacity
Fed’s NBFI scenario may be more use than CCAR – experts
Main severely adverse scenario does not capture contagion risks from any squeeze on non-banks
Auto-encoding term-structure models
An arbitrage-free low-dimensionality interest rate model is presented
Configuration and control: next-level risk analytics for alternative assets
The evolving needs of traditional and alternative asset industries, including the transformative impact of advanced data analytics and model training within new customisable frameworks
CCP models vulnerable to Trump risk
Volatility of ‘will he, won’t he’ tariff strategy could confound clearing house risk models
CME-FICC cross-margin extension timeline questioned
SEC changes and queries around margin segregation may make end-2025 deadline unrealistic
Op risk data: Crypto hack bites Bybit; fat-finger flurry at Citi
Also: OKX gets AML scold, UK motor finance fiasco revs up. Data by ORX News
