Success in Fed stress tests comes with a cost
A number of apparently robust banks failed the US stress tests in March because of qualitative issues – in short, the Fed did not trust the numbers. This could be an ongoing problem for the industry, which is struggling to meet supervisory demands on risk and IT. Joe Rennison reports
For the five banks that failed the latest iteration of the Federal Reserve Board's annual stress tests, the March 26 results were the start of a race to improve and then resubmit capital plans. For the 25 banks that passed, it would be easy, but wrong, to conclude the heat is off. While these institutions are free to make their proposed dividend payments or share buybacks, some are also under
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
One-factor rates models sit behind most XVA calculations
Risk Benchmarking: Dealers coalesce around calibration depth, but runtimes and lookbacks vary sharply
Could a prediction market bet get you fired by your bank?
At least half of US systemic banks limit personal prediction trades, but mention markets still a concern
Dealers still split on XVA desks’ funding remit
Risk Benchmarking: Global dealers use XVA desks to manage swaps funding needs, but most treasuries retain some control
How enterprise risk rose to the top of the bank
Previously a support function, ERM is naturally positioned to identify strategic risks for the board
Can prediction markets pass the institutional sniff test?
Regulated firms need credible event determination methodologies and cross-product margining to enable use, say experts
Most dealers run central XVA desks, but remits vary
Risk Benchmarking: Many banks struggle to track XVA costs and share of derivatives compute
EU banks in India cut contingency costs after clearing deal
Esma MoU with two Indian regulators lifts threat to direct clearing for BNP, SocGen and Deutsche
Big banks look to XVA desks to crush counterparty exposures
Risk Benchmarking: Two-thirds of global dealers run routine optimisation, compared with just 13% of smaller players
