Physics versus finance: Science strikes back

Science strikes back


On October 21, 1993, the US Congress cancelled the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC), a particle accelerator being built under Texas on which $2 billion had been spent. This was not good news for two of my Harvard roommates, both theoretical physicists approaching the completion of their PhDs: their academic job market collapsed overnight. However, both rapidly found employment at Goldman Sachs in New York, where one still works. It was their assertion that derivatives markets – whatever in

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact or view our subscription options here:

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to View our subscription options


Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

This address will be used to create your account

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here