Multi-factor forward curve models for energy risk management
In the second article of this series, Carlos Blanco and Michael Pierce introduce the most common multi-factor models of the forward curve used for energy derivatives pricing and risk measurement
In energy markets, forward price changes over time are largely determined by new information regarding the expected average spot price during a future delivery window, and therefore their behaviour is substantially different from that exhibited by spot prices, which immediately react to short-term changes in the physical market.
Click here for a full version of this article in PDF format, which includes all of the figures and tables within the feature
Forward curve behaviour
Some of the key features of energy forward price behaviour are the following:
• Time-to-maturity effect: when a forward contract approaches its delivery period, its volatility and correlation with other forward contracts changes. As a general rule, as we get closer to the maturity of the contract, the volatility tends to increase (see figure 2.1), while correlations with other contracts often break down. This effect can be observed in the options markets by observing the term structure of implied volatilities from options on forward contracts.
• Complex forward curve dynamics: As we can see in figure 1, within any given period, the forward curve experiences simultaneous changes in levels, slope and inter-month spreads. Simplistic models of the evolution of the forward curve often fail to capture these dynamics.
• Seasonality: the level and variability of many energy futures contracts is highly seasonal. For example, the price levels and fluctuations of the national balancing point gas contract in the UK for January and July delivery have very specific characteristics. In addition, the volatility of those contracts also changes by season, and when spot prices are most volatile, the full forward curve exhibits larger changes.
• Limited time series of contract behaviour: many futures contracts start trading just a few months prior to their delivery period and expire only a few days before the delivery period starts. In order to build a continuous time series of forward prices or returns to derive volatility, correlations and other model parameters, the price history of several contracts needs to be combined.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Buy side would welcome more guidance on managing margin calls
FSB report calls for regulators to review existing standards for non-bank liquidity management
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
Benchmark switch leaves hedging headache for Philippine banks
If interest rates are cut before new benchmark docs are ready, banks face possible NII squeeze
Op risk data: Tech glitch gives customers unlimited funds
Also: Payback for slow Paycheck Protection payouts; SEC hits out at AI washing. Data by ORX News
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Top 10 op risks: change brings challenges as banks splash the cash
Higher interest margins and a trend toward insourcing drive major tech projects
Top 10 op risks: deepfakes drive rise in fraud fears
External fraud re-enters top 10 as artificial intelligence provides new tools for criminals
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
- Top 10 op risks: third parties stoke cyber risk