CFTC prepares to limit energy speculation
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) may limit speculative trading in energy products and other commodities, CFTC chairman Gary Gensler said yesterday.
The CFTC will hold hearings in July and August on the issue. Gensler pointed out that the CFTC sets anti-speculation position limits for agricultural commodities, but not for energy: futures exchanges set limits to prevent market manipulation, but not to "prevent the burdens of excessive speculation".
At present, position limits do not apply to investors using the energy markets for bona fide hedging, but the CFTC might change this to include only users of the physical product rather than investors with a purely financial exposure through other positions.
Gensler said last month the CFTC would be on guard for another speculation-driven energy bubble as the world's economy recovered. The CFTC's energy markets advisory committee was set up in early 2008 after the Commission noticed an "all-time high" of market manipulation, false reporting and trading violations in 2002–2007. In July 2008, a CFTC report found no evidence linking speculation with the oil price spike, but speculators were widely blamed later that year by US authorities.
See also: CFTC targets dealers, leverage and counterparty risk
CFTC names Chilton head of energy committee
The blame game
CFTC dismisses speculation speculation
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Cyber insurance premiums dropped unexpectedly in 2025
Competition among carriers drives down premiums, despite increasing frequency and severity of attacks
Op risk data: Kaiser will helm half-billion-dollar payout for faking illness
Also: Loan collusion clobbers South Korean banks; AML fails at Saxo Bank and Santander. Data by ORX News
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
CGB repo clearing is coming to Hong Kong … but not yet
Market wants at least five years to build infrastructure before regulators consider mandate
Rethinking model validation for GenAI governance
A US model risk leader outlines how banks can recalibrate existing supervisory standards
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
The changing shape of variation margin collateral
Financial firms are open to using a wider variety of collateral when posting VM on uncleared derivatives, but concerns are slowing efforts to use more non-cash alternatives