CFTC prepares to limit energy speculation
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) may limit speculative trading in energy products and other commodities, CFTC chairman Gary Gensler said yesterday.
The CFTC will hold hearings in July and August on the issue. Gensler pointed out that the CFTC sets anti-speculation position limits for agricultural commodities, but not for energy: futures exchanges set limits to prevent market manipulation, but not to "prevent the burdens of excessive speculation".
At present, position limits do not apply to investors using the energy markets for bona fide hedging, but the CFTC might change this to include only users of the physical product rather than investors with a purely financial exposure through other positions.
Gensler said last month the CFTC would be on guard for another speculation-driven energy bubble as the world's economy recovered. The CFTC's energy markets advisory committee was set up in early 2008 after the Commission noticed an "all-time high" of market manipulation, false reporting and trading violations in 2002–2007. In July 2008, a CFTC report found no evidence linking speculation with the oil price spike, but speculators were widely blamed later that year by US authorities.
See also: CFTC targets dealers, leverage and counterparty risk
CFTC names Chilton head of energy committee
The blame game
CFTC dismisses speculation speculation
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Microsoft outage disrupts structured notes trading
Document-heavy OTC trades upended as term sheets and confirmations languished in outboxes
One-factor rates models sit behind most XVA calculations
Risk Benchmarking: Dealers coalesce around calibration depth, but runtimes and lookbacks vary sharply
Could a prediction market bet get you fired by your bank?
At least half of US systemic banks limit personal prediction trades, but mention markets still a concern
Dealers still split on XVA desks’ funding remit
Risk Benchmarking: Global dealers use XVA desks to manage swaps funding needs, but most treasuries retain some control
How enterprise risk rose to the top of the bank
Previously a support function, ERM is naturally positioned to identify strategic risks for the board
Can prediction markets pass the institutional sniff test?
Regulated firms need credible event determination methodologies and cross-product margining to enable use, say experts
Most dealers run central XVA desks, but remits vary
Risk Benchmarking: Many banks struggle to track XVA costs and share of derivatives compute
EU banks in India cut contingency costs after clearing deal
Esma MoU with two Indian regulators lifts threat to direct clearing for BNP, SocGen and Deutsche