Sponsor's article > Op risk and Black Swans
Scarce data is a well-recognised problem for the assessment of operational risk. In such circumstances, David Rowe argues, it is necessary to blend professional judgement with the available data. In doing so, however, it is crucial to counter some well-documented psychological biases in our subjective estimates of probability – and a healthy dose of humility is also advisable.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb (2004) makes an interesting distinction between what he calls type 1 and type 2 environments.1 He defines a type 1 environment as one where most of the contribution to randomness2 comes from the body of a distribution (let’s say the middle 99.9%). This broadly characterises randomness in the physical world, where the normal distribution is common. A type 2 environment is one
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Agentic risk management could arrive ‘sooner than we think’
Risk Live: Models are capable, but banks lack platform and governance to safely run agentic systems
Supervisors becoming more demanding, say ERM teams
Risk Benchmarking: More than half report rising supervisory contact, despite unchanging requirements for an ERM function
Asian dealers may be more exposed than US in AI selloff scenario
Prime brokers face regional counterparty risk from huge flows in leveraged ETFs, say risk managers
Banks upgrade liquidity tests to cope with volatile world
Risk Live: Greater need to assess modern threats from technology transformation
Enterprise Risk Benchmarking 2026: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 52-bank study, covering enterprise risk governance, appetite setting, board reporting, scenario analysis, culture and resilience
Continuous verification holds key to keeping AI on track
Decision-by-decision testing will help users trust AI judgement calls
Banks try to prepare for – not predict – geopolitical shocks
Risk Live: HSBC and KeyBank frameworks were tested by Iran attacks
Pioneers split over future of UK’s digitalised market
Tokenisation provider urges industry to stop waiting for magic to make digitally issued securities possible