Compliance countdown for unnamed trades

LONDON -- While fund managers have outwardly welcomed the changes to the Bank ofEngland’s (BoE)Non-Investment Products (Nips) code, which were published in May, many are failing to comply with its requirement for clients to share their identities with banks’ legal and compliance departments while maintaining ‘Chinese walls’ with traders.

Two top 10 FX banks, which asked to remain nameless, said the situation remains a problem for them. One head of FX at a US bank in London said his bank had been

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here