Inreon sees limited deal volumes
Online trading platform Inreon has seen a number of transactions completed on its internet-based reinsurance trading platforms, but volumes have been muted, with a total value of $30,000 to $600,000 (inreon declined to provide specific figures) through five or six deals having been fulfilled online in the last three months.
While activity has been limited compared with the market in general - a large reinsurer would typically work on about 500 deals at a time - an inreon spokesperson claimed the company is happy with activity to date. "We are on track compared to where we wanted to be. We, and the clients, are gaining experience and improving the system. And we expect volumes to grow."
Inreon, set up in December 2000, saw its first proposed risk deal posted in June this year. So far the company has 10 brokers and 12 primary companies in four different countries dealing through its platform. It currently has nine reinsurers on board, with around 15 buyers using the system.
Management believes activity will grow as the advantages of internet-based trading becomes more widely realised. "Internet transactions will cut down on the administration costs associated with reinsurance transactions. Currently administration costs can be as high as 30% of the overall premium. Dealing online could reduce this by up to 50%," the spokesperson claimed.
Reinsurers accepting business through inreon have to pay a fee for using the platform but are able to benefit through the increased distribution channels. Buyers themselves have the advantage of being able to deal with a broad range of reinsurers. "Inreon provides reinsurance buyers with a unique platform to access reinsurance capacity on a global basis," said Rob Bredahl, inreon chief executive.
At present reinsurers only offer facultative property contracts on inreon. These are single policies rather than treaty reinsurance contracts that cover portfolios of multiple policies, which generally command higher margins.
Inreon said it plans to roll out a wider range of products sometime later this year.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: FIS pays the price for Worldpay synergy slip-up
Also: Liberty Mutual rings up record age bias case; Nationwide’s fraud failings. Data by ORX News
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and Level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities
Allocating financing costs: centralised vs decentralised treasury
Centralisation can boost efficiency when coupled with an effective pricing and attribution framework
EVE and NII dominate IRRBB limit-setting
ALM Benchmarking study finds majority of banks relying on hard risk limits, and a minority supplementing with early-warning indicators
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk
Collateral velocity is disappearing behind a digital curtain
Dealers may welcome digital-era rewiring to free up collateral movement, but tokenisation will obscure metrics
New EBA taxonomy could help integrate emerging op risks
Extra loss flags will allow banks to track transversal risks like geopolitics and AI, say experts