Property derivatives growing, but pricing still difficult
The UK property derivatives market has crossed the £1 billion ($1.88 billion) notional mark, but pricing information shows that the market is still far from efficient, according to the London-based property think-tank, Investment Property Forum (IPF).
Presenting at the first quarterly IPF breakfast meeting this morning, Ian Cullen, the forum's head of systems and information standards, reported that the UK property derivatives market had reached a total accumulated notional value of £1.95 billion by the end of June this year, with 157 deals completed, according to an IPF survey.But Cullen warned: "We can be confident that these numbers are wrong. In the early days we were tracking simple matched trades and it was easy to determine the total size - now it is rather more difficult." The total value could be over £2 billion by the end of the year, he said.
Average deal size has fallen to £12.4 million from £24 million over the past 18 months, but Cullen said: "I anticipate this will rise again after June - we have already seen some deals in the £100 million price range."
Meanwhile, sectoral deals continued to grow, up from total notional of £60 million in Q3 2005 – the first period that IPF measured sectoral statistics – to £90 million in Q2 2006.
A survey of 75 end-users at the meeting revealed sharply higher levels of comfort with commercial property derivatives than with products based on industrial or retail property. The survey took pricing averages from three major brokers and asked participants whether they would buy, sell or remain neutral. The forum's members were generally keen to buy and sell products based on City and West End offices, despite higher margins, but were largely neutral on industrial and retail property.
Another section of the survey found that 38% considered themselves "ready to trade" and 60% would be trading within the next six months.
A review of property derivatives pricing, meanwhile, suggested that margins were too high due to flaws in the market. Professors Andrew Baum, Colin Lizieri and Gianluca Marcato from Reading University Business School predicted that an efficient market should converge on margins of around 100bp, to allow for transaction costs and commissions. The higher margins at present were due to a lack of mandates limiting activity combined with high lot sizes and transaction costs. They believe margins will fall on all tenors in the long term.
But Paul Robinson, an executive director in property company CBRE's capital markets division, argued that management costs, liquidity risk and commissions meant that convergence should be around 200bp instead.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Beware war exclusions in cyber insurance, risk managers told
Risk Live: Experts say policy wording is tightening up following rise in ransomware attacks
Top 10 operational risks for 2024
The biggest op risks for the year ahead, as chosen by senior industry practitioners
Top 10 op risks: AI fears drive cyber risk to record high
External fraud re-enters top 10; change management now a top five concern
Harsh judgements: why Stateside lenders are upping the Q-factor
As CRE stalls, qualitative adjustments are forming a larger part of US banks’ credit risk allowances
As FCMs dwindle, regulators fear systemic risk
Panellists highlight dangers of clearing membership becoming more concentrated
Bank credit risk: how well do you know your counterparties?
As financial markets evolve, evaluating the complex credit risk exposures of non-bank counterparties is crucial for effective risk management, says Quantifi’s Dmitry Pugachevsky
EU index managers face funding risks as US moves to T+1
Rotations from European to US assets will need prefunding due to slower EU settlement
CCPs show support for daily stress margin tools
Anti-procyclicality measure floated by HKEX official sparks interest from rivals including Nasdaq
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Regulators’ FRTB estimates based on faulty premise – industry study
- As FCMs dwindle, regulators fear systemic risk