FSA to order CFD disclosure
The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) will treat contracts for difference (CFDs) in the same way as shareholdings for disclosure purposes, it announced today.
Under proposed rules, to be finalised in February 2009, holdings of CFDs equivalent to 3% or more of the underlying company's total equity will have to be disclosed, putting CFDs and direct equity holdings on an equal footing.
The news marks a hardening of the FSA's line towards CFDs since its original proposals back in November 2007. Then, it suggested three options. First, the status quo: CFDs need not be disclosed at all, except during takeover proceedings, when holdings of 1% of stock (either direct or through CFDs) would have to be made public. Second, disclosure of 3% positions, unless the holder undertook not to seek voting rights or other influence. Third, general disclosure of all CFD holdings over 5%.
The latest proposal follows the third option, but imposes stricter criteria. Rather than a threshold of 5% in CFDs, which would allow an investor to build up an undeclared stake of almost 8% (just under 3% in shares and just under 5% in CFDs), the limit is now 3% total in either shares, CFDs or a combination. The only exception is for writers of CFDs who are providing liquidity and will be granted exemption, the FSA said.
The new rules will come into force by September 2009. Last year the FSA estimated the cost of a general disclosure rule at up to £50 million, but it said today that exempting intermediaries would "significantly reduce the cost".
See also: Open to disclosure?
FSA cracks down on CFD use
Contracting out
FSA's CFD proposal will hamper growth, says Isda
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Top 10 op risks: Resilience put to the test in 2026
Firms reinforce first line, ‘nth’-party diligence, scenario analysis and vendor exit plans
Vida portfolio solutions on J.P. Morgan Markets
J.P. Morgan’s Vida portfolio solutions are being applied across financing and portfolio management, reflecting a shift towards more scalable, integrated investment infrastructure
Top 10 operational risks for 2026
Industry shares intel on biggest collective threats, as well as remedies and loss gauges
Top 10 op risks 2026: Cyber stays top, AI risk enters at fifth
Third-party and outsourcing risk climbs to third; fraud and fincrime edge out geopolitical risk
Deutsche Bank CRO’s year of living dangerously
Marcus Chromik explains his approach to geopolitical risk, operational resilience and AI adoption
EU can handle energy price pressure – it’s been here before
Reforms made after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine have made region more resilient to energy shocks, officials say
Rising reliance on internal auditors spooks regulators and industry
Risk managers warn US is substituting supervisors with auditors; could compromise independence
What futures and options say about the cost of war
Spot prices reveal major disruption, futures indicate this will pass, options imply ongoing instability