FSA to order CFD disclosure
The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) will treat contracts for difference (CFDs) in the same way as shareholdings for disclosure purposes, it announced today.
Under proposed rules, to be finalised in February 2009, holdings of CFDs equivalent to 3% or more of the underlying company's total equity will have to be disclosed, putting CFDs and direct equity holdings on an equal footing.
The news marks a hardening of the FSA's line towards CFDs since its original proposals back in November 2007. Then, it suggested three options. First, the status quo: CFDs need not be disclosed at all, except during takeover proceedings, when holdings of 1% of stock (either direct or through CFDs) would have to be made public. Second, disclosure of 3% positions, unless the holder undertook not to seek voting rights or other influence. Third, general disclosure of all CFD holdings over 5%.
The latest proposal follows the third option, but imposes stricter criteria. Rather than a threshold of 5% in CFDs, which would allow an investor to build up an undeclared stake of almost 8% (just under 3% in shares and just under 5% in CFDs), the limit is now 3% total in either shares, CFDs or a combination. The only exception is for writers of CFDs who are providing liquidity and will be granted exemption, the FSA said.
The new rules will come into force by September 2009. Last year the FSA estimated the cost of a general disclosure rule at up to £50 million, but it said today that exempting intermediaries would "significantly reduce the cost".
See also: Open to disclosure?
FSA cracks down on CFD use
Contracting out
FSA's CFD proposal will hamper growth, says Isda
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Fireside chat: Advancing FX clearing for safer settlement
Developments in FX clearing are supporting the creation of a safer, more scalable settlement infrastructure
FHLB Cincinnati explores AI to spot failing banks
Agentic model detects anomalies, monitors sentiment and drafts credit reports for analyst review
Iran strikes a stress test for CCP margin models
CME’s Span2 and Ice’s IRM2 are performing as advertised. The next few days could test their mettle
Most banks run physical climate scenarios beyond 2050
Risk Benchmarking data finds majority rely on geospatial asset mapping, while a third use third-party catastrophe models
Big banks love their climate vendors; small banks, not so much
Risk Benchmarking: Lenders with blue-chip loan books more likely to favour climate tools, research finds
Mob rule: populism’s rise pits banks against the people
Trump and fellow mavericks are reshaping politics, leaving banks scrambling to adjust to new and unpredictable risks
JSCC considers default fund consolidation
Japanese clearing house looks for efficiency gains amid expansion of clearing products and influx of international firms
EU clearing houses pressured to diversify cloud vendors
CROs and regulators see tech concentration risk as a barrier to operational resilience