FSA to order CFD disclosure
The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) will treat contracts for difference (CFDs) in the same way as shareholdings for disclosure purposes, it announced today.
Under proposed rules, to be finalised in February 2009, holdings of CFDs equivalent to 3% or more of the underlying company's total equity will have to be disclosed, putting CFDs and direct equity holdings on an equal footing.
The news marks a hardening of the FSA's line towards CFDs since its original proposals back in November 2007. Then, it suggested three options. First, the status quo: CFDs need not be disclosed at all, except during takeover proceedings, when holdings of 1% of stock (either direct or through CFDs) would have to be made public. Second, disclosure of 3% positions, unless the holder undertook not to seek voting rights or other influence. Third, general disclosure of all CFD holdings over 5%.
The latest proposal follows the third option, but imposes stricter criteria. Rather than a threshold of 5% in CFDs, which would allow an investor to build up an undeclared stake of almost 8% (just under 3% in shares and just under 5% in CFDs), the limit is now 3% total in either shares, CFDs or a combination. The only exception is for writers of CFDs who are providing liquidity and will be granted exemption, the FSA said.
The new rules will come into force by September 2009. Last year the FSA estimated the cost of a general disclosure rule at up to £50 million, but it said today that exempting intermediaries would "significantly reduce the cost".
See also: Open to disclosure?
FSA cracks down on CFD use
Contracting out
FSA's CFD proposal will hamper growth, says Isda
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Slimmed-down and automated, ERM seeks a seat at the top table
Latest Risk Benchmarking exercise finds ERM growing in influence, even as headcounts shrink
From Pillar to Pillar… to post: where now for op risk in Europe?
Experts think enhanced Pillar 2 charge informed by Dora would be more useful than a blunt Pillar 1
JSCC faces pushback on plans to merge futures default funds
Members say commodities products should be kept fully segregated because of different risk profile
CME aims to offer client UST cross-margining internally in 2027
CCP has filed initial proposal with SEC; wants to offer more products than joint FICC programme
Manuela Veloso on how banks can make their AI dreams reality
Former JP Morgan head of AI research says open-ended enquiry will unlock technology’s full potential
The ECB’s geopolitical stress test needs a price
Only a market can say how much it should cost to insure against losses from a geopolitical risk event, and none exists, argues academic
Risk managers grapple with hazards and benefits of intraday repo
Expected increase in collateral velocity and re-use could also boost leverage and risk in markets
Repo tokens won’t be cleared. Or will they?
Uncertainty lingers over clearing status of tokenised Treasuries, with decision likely devolved to DTCC