Prime broker shortcomings contribute to hedge fund risk
Hedge Funds are incurring extra operational risk as a result of inadequate prime brokerage services, according to TCA Consulting.
Its research found that brokers were working with poorly integrated systems and a limited degree of straight-through processing (STP). This lack of integration was hindering brokers' ability to provide information for hedge funds’ risk management processes. Hedge funds depend on their prime brokers to facilitate settlements and process corporate actions, both of which carry high levels of operational risk.
TCA's report stated that less than 50% of hedge funds relied on prime brokers to provide even basic risk measurement information. As hedge funds often use more than one prime broker, they have difficulties integrating risk reports from multiple sources and systems. Prime brokers also complicate the process, as some of the risk management tools they offer are not relevant to all their fund clients.
The report relates an example of an unnamed hedge fund manager complaining that the database used to underpin the risk measurement tools being used by its prime brokers covered only British and American shares, making it useless for emerging market stocks or non-equity instruments. Since high-quality risk assessment in these areas is crucial, such anomalies should be addressed, said Sandra Williams, author of the report.TCA declined to reveal the names of the institutions it had surveyed.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Top 10 investment risks for 2026
AI, strained governments, inflated private assets: risky bets have become hard to avoid
Risk managers question US reach of Dora third-party list
Some EU subsidiaries included, but regulator control over cloud providers could still be limited
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
One in five banks targets a 30-day liquidity survival horizon
ALM Benchmarking research finds wide divergence in liquidity risk appetites, even among large lenders
BofA urges horizontal CCP fix after CME outage, others demur
Analysts say clearing meltdown bolsters case for futures-for-futures exchange with FMX
Bank ALM tech still dominated by manual workflows
Batch processing and Excel files still pervade, with only one in four lenders planning tech upgrades
Many banks ignore spectre of SVB in liquidity stress tests
In ALM Benchmarking exercise, majority of banks have no internal tests focusing on stress horizons of less than 30 days