Financial institutions reassess risk probabilities
Financial institutions are now increasingly concerned with the likelihood of certain risks following the World Trade Center terrorist attacks, Enron’s near-collapse and Argentina’s debt problems, the US Securities Industry Association (SIA) said in a research report.
The report has emerged through ongoing discussions at the SIA risk management committee, whose participants are heads of risk management at major financial institutions.
Frank Fernandez, senior vice-president, chief economist and director of research at the SIA, told RiskNews that despite the increasing interdependency of global financial markets, these institutions had performed well under the pressures of recent crises due to lessons learnt from the Long-Term Capital Management, Asian and Russian crises of recent years.
Fernandez said events this year have prompted risk managers to think further about event clusters and the importance of stress testing and value-at-risk calculations. Firms are still dealing with known risks, but there is increasing recognition that the probability assigned to certain outcomes needs to be modified, he said.
He added that changes in the underlying parameters of risk models, and an increasing demand for real-time assessment data, were gaining prominence. "There is a need for current data. In the meantime, firms are running multiple models side-by-side, but same day/next day data has been long in coming, and achieving seamless real-time data is the real task for the future," Fernandez said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Credit spread risk: the cryptic peril on bank balance sheets
Some bankers fear EU regulatory push on CSRBB has done little to improve risk management
Top 10 investment risks for 2026
AI, strained governments, inflated private assets: risky bets have become hard to avoid
Risk managers question US reach of Dora third-party list
Some EU subsidiaries included, but regulator control over cloud providers could still be limited
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
One in five banks targets a 30-day liquidity survival horizon
ALM Benchmarking research finds wide divergence in liquidity risk appetites, even among large lenders
BofA urges horizontal CCP fix after CME outage, others demur
Analysts say clearing meltdown bolsters case for futures-for-futures exchange with FMX
Bank ALM tech still dominated by manual workflows
Batch processing and Excel files still pervade, with only one in four lenders planning tech upgrades
Many banks ignore spectre of SVB in liquidity stress tests
In ALM Benchmarking exercise, majority of banks have no internal tests focusing on stress horizons of less than 30 days