Financial institutions reassess risk probabilities
Financial institutions are now increasingly concerned with the likelihood of certain risks following the World Trade Center terrorist attacks, Enron’s near-collapse and Argentina’s debt problems, the US Securities Industry Association (SIA) said in a research report.
The report has emerged through ongoing discussions at the SIA risk management committee, whose participants are heads of risk management at major financial institutions.
Frank Fernandez, senior vice-president, chief economist and director of research at the SIA, told RiskNews that despite the increasing interdependency of global financial markets, these institutions had performed well under the pressures of recent crises due to lessons learnt from the Long-Term Capital Management, Asian and Russian crises of recent years.
Fernandez said events this year have prompted risk managers to think further about event clusters and the importance of stress testing and value-at-risk calculations. Firms are still dealing with known risks, but there is increasing recognition that the probability assigned to certain outcomes needs to be modified, he said.
He added that changes in the underlying parameters of risk models, and an increasing demand for real-time assessment data, were gaining prominence. "There is a need for current data. In the meantime, firms are running multiple models side-by-side, but same day/next day data has been long in coming, and achieving seamless real-time data is the real task for the future," Fernandez said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: HSBC hit with $400m external fraud loss
Also: China’s unlicensed trading clampdown; SocGen’s insurance mis-selling woes. Data by ORX News
Clearers face heavy lift on CME-FICC cross-margin service
Dual registration and regulation plus uncertainty over close-outs all weigh on client offering
Appetite breaches climb for top op risks
Risk Benchmarking: Low tolerance and heightened threat environment combine to test banks’ limits for cyber, resilience, third-party risk
How gatecrashers could spoil the tokenisation party
Blockchain can curb settlement risks, but that could come at the expense of new third-party risks
Op Risk Benchmarking: Banks seek a home for AI risk
Risk.net’s 2026 study sees record participation and collective unease, as banks race to incorporate AI into op risk frameworks
Contract negotiation tops tech sovereignty for banks in Asia
Regulatory pressure is rising, but industry still focused on service agreements with third parties
The SaaSpocalypse shows private markets need risk models
Investors have little idea how bad the losses in private credit are going to be
Crisis? Which crisis? How ECB stress test failed to see Strait
Banks were told to design geopolitical shock scenarios, but some focused mainly on tariffs