JP Morgan Chase pushes for new op risk measure
In the opening session of Risk's OpRisk 2002 conference in New York today Joseph Sabatini, head of corporate operational risk at JP Morgan Chase, said the bank was considering a move to treat operational risk as an independent firm-wide performance measurement for the first time.
Sabatini said use of the benchmark is frustrating because it does not reward better-than-average operational risk management.
"There is a significant transition that is underway within our industry," said Sabatini. He added that JP Morgan Chase was in the midst of developing an operational risk framework combining self assesment techniques valid against the bank's loss experience, predictive analysis, risk-based capital methods, and, ultimately, risk mitigation tools.
Sabatini said that such an approach would not only lower the probability of catastrophic losses from operational risk, but reduce the overall probability of losses. "We will end up with improvements from an expected loss function as well as an unexpected loss function," said Sabatini. "These will result in improved and sustainable cost efficiencies, and, if not lower captial, at least allow a better use and more efficient allocation of capital for operational risk."
Sabatini cautioned that success for comprehensive firm-wide operational risk measures in the banking industry was far from guaranteed. Making the benefits of operational risk management clear across a bank and evolving industry standards still needs much work, he said.
But one major boost for operational risk standard-setting has come from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's operational risk capital proposals, due to become effective in 2005. "I have some difficulty with some of the proposals, but I think they are directionally correct," said Sabatini. "If it wasn't for these initiatiatives, I don't think our industry would be where it is today."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Rethinking model validation for GenAI governance
A US model risk leader outlines how banks can recalibrate existing supervisory standards
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
The changing shape of variation margin collateral
Financial firms are open to using a wider variety of collateral when posting VM on uncleared derivatives, but concerns are slowing efforts to use more non-cash alternatives
Repo clearing: expanding access, boosting resilience
Michel Semaan, head of RepoClear at LSEG, discusses evolving requirements in repo clearing
The state of IMA: great expectations meet reality
Latest trading book rules overhaul internal models approach, but most banks are opting out. Two risk experts explore why
How geopolitical risk turned into a systemic stress test
Conflict over resources is reshaping markets in a way that goes beyond occasional risk premia
Many banks see obstacles to options-based IRRBB hedging
Liquidity, accounting treatment and culture seen as impediments to wider use of swaptions, caps and floors