Op risk expenditure to shoot up, predicts report
Expenditure on operational risk technology systems will rise to $8.2 billion by 2007 from the current level of $5.2 billion, according to research published by Towergroup, the Massachusetts-based technology consultants.
The report estimates that 30% of IT spending associated with compliance in the financial services industry consists of wasteful duplication - which TowerGroup said equates to $10 billion globally in IT waste alone - with big companies spread across disparate product lines the worst effected. It further claims that 40% of the $10 billion waste relates to investments in IT, where the benefits that could be spread throughout an organisation are instead implemented in silos, limiting the impact of the system to one product line or geographical unit.
The consultants estimate compliance waste will increase by 25% over the next five years unless financial institutions view regulatory compliance and IT spending on a holistic, enterprise-wide basis. In addition, it said firms should utilise the broad range of technology systems that serve a broader business purpose than merely supporting enterprise risk management.
Financial institutions should welcome Basel II for inspiring an enterprise risk management culture throughout the organisation, said Virginia Garcia, the report’s author. Institutions would be shortsighted to do just enough to meet regulatory requirements, she adds. “There is an urgency to adopt a risk culture that arms firms with the information they need to increase shareholder value.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities
Allocating financing costs: centralised vs decentralised treasury
Centralisation can boost efficiency when coupled with an effective pricing and attribution framework
EVE and NII dominate IRRBB limit-setting
ALM Benchmarking study finds majority of banks relying on hard risk limits, and a minority supplementing with early-warning indicators
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk
Collateral velocity is disappearing behind a digital curtain
Dealers may welcome digital-era rewiring to free up collateral movement, but tokenisation will obscure metrics
New EBA taxonomy could help integrate emerging op risks
Extra loss flags will allow banks to track transversal risks like geopolitics and AI, say experts
Third of banks run ALM with five or fewer staff
Across 46 firms, asset-liability management is usually housed in treasury, but formal remits and staffing allocations differ sharply