Op risk expenditure to shoot up, predicts report
Expenditure on operational risk technology systems will rise to $8.2 billion by 2007 from the current level of $5.2 billion, according to research published by Towergroup, the Massachusetts-based technology consultants.
The report estimates that 30% of IT spending associated with compliance in the financial services industry consists of wasteful duplication - which TowerGroup said equates to $10 billion globally in IT waste alone - with big companies spread across disparate product lines the worst effected. It further claims that 40% of the $10 billion waste relates to investments in IT, where the benefits that could be spread throughout an organisation are instead implemented in silos, limiting the impact of the system to one product line or geographical unit.
The consultants estimate compliance waste will increase by 25% over the next five years unless financial institutions view regulatory compliance and IT spending on a holistic, enterprise-wide basis. In addition, it said firms should utilise the broad range of technology systems that serve a broader business purpose than merely supporting enterprise risk management.
Financial institutions should welcome Basel II for inspiring an enterprise risk management culture throughout the organisation, said Virginia Garcia, the report’s author. Institutions would be shortsighted to do just enough to meet regulatory requirements, she adds. “There is an urgency to adopt a risk culture that arms firms with the information they need to increase shareholder value.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
We’re gonna need a bigger board: geopolitical risk takes centre stage
As threats multiply, responsibility for geopolitical risk is shifting to ERM teams
At BNY, a risk-centric approach to GenAI
Centralised platform allows bank to focus on risk management, governance and, not least, talent in its AI build
CROs shoulder climate risk load, but bigger org picture is murky
Dedicated teams vary wildly in size, while ownership is shared among risk, sustainability and the business
‘The models are not bloody wrong’: a storm in climate risk
Risk.net’s latest benchmarking exercise shows banks confronting decades-long exposures, while grappling with political headwinds, limited resources and data gaps
Climate Risk Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 43-bank study, covering climate governance, physical and transition risks, stress-testing, technology, and regulation
ISITC’s Paul Fullam on the ‘anxiety’ over T+1 in Europe
Trade processing chair blames budget constraints, testing and unease over operational risk ahead of settlement move
Cyber insurance premiums dropped unexpectedly in 2025
Competition among carriers drives down premiums, despite increasing frequency and severity of attacks