Risk 2002 Europe: Derman highlights new behavioural finance direction
A fresh perspective on the risk-reward payoff that drives financial markets can be gained by abandoning the traditional concept of time in financial models, according to Emanuel Derman, a New York-based managing director in Goldman Sachs’ firm-wide risk group.
As an alternative to replication, Derman presented a different kind of model that uses the concept of intrinsic time – a dimensionless timescale that counts the number of trading opportunities that occur, rather than the calendar time that passes between them. “I hope this model will have some relevance to the behaviour of investors expecting inordinate returns in highly speculative markets,” he said.
The model’s construction is inspired by thermodynamics: Derman wanted to show how macroscopic results about financial risk can be obtained from a few basic principles, similar to the way in which large-scale properties such as an object’s temperature arise from simple interactions between atoms.
During periods of speculation, market participants such as day traders instinctively focus on the flow of trading opportunities - suggesting that intrinsic time is a more appropriate timescale on which to formulate models.
This rationale naturally leads to the concept of the temperature of a stock – a function of both standard volatility and trading frequency. The ‘hotter’ a stock is, the higher its expected returns. The theory of intrinsic time can also be extended to include options valuation and perhaps even account for part of the volatility skew, Derman claimed.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Managing risk to accelerate agentic AI value creation
Banks can accelerate agentic AI adoption by aligning each use case’s risks, controls and capabilities, enabling safe, accountable and value-driven deployment
One legal entity. Multiple IDs. Three business risks.
How fragmented entity IDs undermine risk, compliance and revenue decisions
An agentic bank? Not so fast
With no clear definition or way to gauge ROI, claims of AI adoption should be taken with a pinch of salt
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment
For enterprise risk, influence runs deeper than any veto
Risk Benchmarking study finds formal veto rights concentrated among the largest lenders, but used only as a last resort
Intraday pricing: fixed income’s next frontier
With firms looking to price fixed income securities on an intraday basis, specialist pricing providers such as LSEG help address cost, complexity and time-to-market challenges
Tech and data fragmentation irks enterprise risk managers
Risk Benchmarking: Often at the mercy of decisions made by other parts of the bank, ERM heads gripe at disparate systems, poor UX and reporting gaps
At bigger banks, enterprise risk owns scenario frameworks
Risk Benchmarking research finds ERM teams tasked with providing effective challenge on scenario construction across risk silos