NAB to reopen options desk
National Australia Bank (NAB) hopes to reopen its currency options desk in the "near term", said chairman Graham Kraehe last week, reports RiskNews' sister publication, FX Week .
In order to reopen the desk, NAB had to address a series of risk management failings, including introducing a new policy on limits, routinely breached by the four traders responsible for the losses. Among other requirements, NAB had to improve oversight of risk positions, independent sign-off on pricing models for outstanding currency options, tighter control around internal trades and back-office confirmations, and a reliable procedure for sourcing revaluation rates.
Kraehe said last week the bank is making "good progress" in making the required changes. He said these include: imposing tighter control over market trading; appointing a new head of market risk; adding more staff in risk and redefining their roles; and implementing a new risk limits policy for trading. A spokesperson added that the bank has improved the process by which employees can raise points of concern with the bank.
NAB has also implemented a new bonus structure amid speculation that the four sacked traders entered into ever more risky and unauthorised trades to protect their annual bonus payouts, totalling A$790,000 for all four for the 2003 financial year.
Despite NAB's efforts to get its currency options desk back on track, some feel the bank is facing an uphill struggle after being out of the market for nearly nine months. One options specialist in London said it would need to price very competitively to win back business that will have moved elsewhere.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Regulators must think bigger to tackle tech risks, says Hong Kong SFC
Leung warns AI adoption and recent cyber scares show new threats require global co-operation
Investment workflows move beyond the trade
J.P. Morgan experts reveal how Vida’s digital tools enhance transparency, analytics, portfolio oversight and investment lifecycle management
Europe expects FRTB to bite on XVA hedges
Risk Benchmarking: One-third of European dealers fear new market risk rules will have major effect on hedges
Non-bank dealers urge rethink on FICC default fund reshuffle
Separating margin will cut bank capital, but non-banks warn they face disproportionate risk-sharing
Why a hybrid approach works best for AI in credit risk modelling
AI helps models look beyond quarterly reports, but CRO says governance curtails full automation
Eurex product co-head departs
Zubin Ramdarshan’s exit comes after exchange CEO Robbert Booij confirms departure
Off the grid? Dealers mull XVA cloud shift
Risk Benchmarking: 69% of European banks still run core XVA calculations predominantly on-premises, and 75% of global dealers
Banks want AML data upgrade to complement US regulatory reform
FinCEN’s proposed overhaul sparks debate on whether it will lead to smarter or weaker supervision