
Mixed benefits for banks from independent valuations
Since the subprime crisis began in 2007 and sapped liquidity from the structured finance market, banks have been criticised for failing to accurately value the asset-backed securities held on their books. The use of flawed input assumptions and data spanning only a limited time horizon when markets were relatively benign often led to inaccurate valuations.
Regulatory bodies, including the Senior Supervisors Group and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, have called on banks to improve their models and seek independent verification of internal valuations if possible. But independent data vendors who provide valuations say there is a greater interest from asset managers and hedge funds seeking to assure investors their valuations are accurate and well-researched.
Those banks that have sought out their services have done so more as a simple compliance exercise than a true risk management practice. "The banks are definitely not the most active group in seeking out independent valuations. If they do, then it will be to confirm what they already believe to be the correct valuation," said Curtis Pyke, director of sales at OTCValuations, a Vancouver-based data vendor. "We have not had many price challenges from banks, so it is hard to say exactly how the numbers are being used."
One reason why banks may not have rushed to seek out independent valuations is that despite increasing regulatory focus on the issue, there is not yet any binding legal requirement on banks to use third-party valuations. The models and assumptions used by data vendors are also not significantly different to those banks have used in the past, so the sole benefit is the neutrality of the vendor and its ability to source data from across the market.
"Our valuations are fairly close to those of the banks because we're essentially replicating what they do but in an unbiased fashion," said Greg Cripps, chief executive of Prism Valuation, a London-based provider of valuations on a range of complex instruments.
But other vendors insist the need for independent valuations is being taken seriously and is more than a compliance exercise, with banks often challenging the values and the assumptions used to reach them. "It's a lot more than just a box-ticking exercise," said Peter Jones, head of valuations at Standard & Poor's. "Banks are looking at this in a much more educated way because they now realise they can't just take a price at face value."
See also: Bernanke: Public-private partnership required to value toxic assets
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Investing in operational readiness to optimise FRTB capital
A forum of industry experts discusses the implementation of FRTB, the burden of investment into data and infrastructure for FRTB compliance, the considerations for banks in using the standardised approach (SA) and the internal model approach (IMA)
Top 10 operational risks: The umpire strikes back
Tougher regulatory enforcement, new consumer rules and rise of ESG are ringing alarm bells
Ion wasn’t deemed a ‘critical’ vendor by most clients
Software firm escaped heavy scrutiny ahead of cyber attack, says US Treasury official
Op risk data: Stanford fraud haunts banks for billions
Also: Helaba’s crank capital relief; TSE stock price sanction; 1MDB mauls Mudabala. Data by ORX News
Hacked off: banks demand answers after Ion cyber attack
Clients left in the dark about ransomware attack that disrupted futures trading last month
Digital exposure makes fraud management a vital responsibility for financial institutions
Fraud management and detection continue to be an increasing area of concern for financial institutions worldwide
UBS takeover of Credit Suisse to trigger higher G-Sib surcharge
At 14.2%, UBS’s CET1 capital ratio is more than sufficient to absorb the deal
Nasdaq exec criticises VAR models in erratic energy markets
FIA Boca 2023: Model being adopted by rivals is “bad choice” for unpredictable assets, says exchange tech official