Risk 2002 USA: World Bank’s Perlin questions validity of risk model assumptions
The World Bank’s chief financial officer, Gary Perlin, questioned whether some of the broad assumptions used in risk modelling were still valid in the current economic climate today during a keynote address at Risk magazine’s Risk 2002 USA conference in Boston.
Events such as Enron’s collapse, US corporate credit events and Argentina’s sovereign default, have called into question some aspects of current thinking on risk management, according to Perlin. “We are now questioning whether some of the broad assumptions underlying our models are still valid.”
Other open questions included whether or not changes in risk tolerance among investors, and generally higher volatility in financial markets, are part of a structural change, or are simply changing with the economic cycle, he said.
Meanwhile, Harry Markowitz – pioneer of modern portfolio theory – took a different tack, using his keynote address to present his latest research on portfolio management. Using utility theory, Markowitz demonstrated how a heuristic utility function can produce comparable risk-reward characteristics to that of an optimal solution calculated via simulation for a simple small portfolio.
Speaking of the case of a large portfolio including a dozen asset classes and a thousand individual securities, Markowitz said: “If all the world’s current computing power were to have started trying to find the optimal solution - including all state variables and time periods - for a very large portfolio back at the time of the big bang, it would still be calculating now.” Whether or not the similarity between the heuristic and optimal solutions found for a simple portfolio holds for large portfolios is not yet known.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Review of 2025: It’s the end of the world, and it feels fine
Markets proved resilient as Trump redefined US policies – but questions are piling up about 2026 and beyond
BofA urges horizontal CCP fix after CME outage, others demur
Analysts say clearing meltdown bolsters case for futures-for-futures exchange with FMX
One in five banks targets a 30-day liquidity survival horizon
ALM Benchmarking research finds wide divergence in liquidity risk appetites, even among large lenders
Bank ALM tech still dominated by manual workflows
Batch processing and Excel files still pervade, with only one in four lenders planning tech upgrades
Many banks ignore spectre of SVB in liquidity stress tests
In ALM Benchmarking exercise, majority of banks have no internal tests focusing on stress horizons of less than 30 days
Quant Finance Master’s Guide 2026
Risk.net’s guide to the world’s leading quant master’s programmes, with the top 25 schools ranked
ALM Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 46-bank study, covering ALM governance, balance-sheet strategy, stress-testing, technology and regulation
Staff, survival days, models – where banks split on ALM
Liquidity and rate risks are as old as banking; but the 46 banks in our benchmarking study have different ways to manage them