Bank of England’s Allsopp questions role of interest rates in bubbles
Christopher Allsopp, a member of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee (MPC), has cast doubt on the effectiveness of using interest rates to head-off asset price bubbles.
Allsopp said it was “hard enough” to establish a credible reaction function – which delineates how the instruments of monetary policy are adjusted to reflect the economic environment and targets – when using interest rates to manage inflation.
While conceding that the use of interest rates to head-off bubbles could be justified in certain cases, Allsopp claimed such action could lead to a reaction function that is “far less rule-like and predictable", and a system that is likely to be “less transparent and accountable".
His comments echo those made by US Federal Reserve chairman, Alan Greenspan, earlier this month. Greenspan claimed it is far from obvious that a bubble can be pre-empted by a central bank without inducing a substantial contraction in the economy, but conceded that better models of risk premiums are needed.
In addition to his membership of the Bank of England’s MPC, Allsopp is a fellow in economics at New College, Oxford and a reader in economic policy at the University of Oxford.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: FIS pays the price for Worldpay synergy slip-up
Also: Liberty Mutual rings up record age bias case; Nationwide’s fraud failings. Data by ORX News
Banks hold 73% of liquidity buffer in cash and Level 1 assets, on average
Largest lenders hold highest share of central bank reserves in buffer, latest analysis shows
EBA supports global op risk taxonomy, but it won’t happen soon
New EU framework designed to ease adoption by banks; other jurisdictions have different priorities
Allocating financing costs: centralised vs decentralised treasury
Centralisation can boost efficiency when coupled with an effective pricing and attribution framework
EVE and NII dominate IRRBB limit-setting
ALM Benchmarking study finds majority of banks relying on hard risk limits, and a minority supplementing with early-warning indicators
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk
Collateral velocity is disappearing behind a digital curtain
Dealers may welcome digital-era rewiring to free up collateral movement, but tokenisation will obscure metrics
New EBA taxonomy could help integrate emerging op risks
Extra loss flags will allow banks to track transversal risks like geopolitics and AI, say experts