VAR “not to blame” for 1998 crisis, says leading academic

In his paper, 'Fallacies About The Effects of Market Risk Management Systems', Jorion takes a fresh look at allegations that risk management systems based on VAR measures contributed to increased volatility in financial markets in the wake of the near-collapse of the Long-Term Capital Management hedge fund in 1998.

Some commentators have claimed that VAR measures – which define a maximum loss over a target horizon – encourage a vicious circle of position-cutting by traders when financial markets weaken sharply and banks struggle to maintain their regulatory capital ratios.

But Jorion, who is also the editor of The Journal of Risk, said his paper provides new evidence that VAR regulatory charges for commercial banks cannot be blamed for the volatility of 1998. The paper shows that: “Market risk charges move very slowly in response to changing market conditions due to the averaging over the last 60 days and slow updating imposed by Basel [capital adequacy] rules.”

For more on the Journal of Risk see: www.thejournalofrisk.com.

  • LinkedIn  
  • Save this article
  • Print this page  

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact [email protected] or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact [email protected] to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here: