More regulation inevitable, say industry experts
Regulators will focus on processes, systems and controls says expert panel on a recent OpRisk & Compliance roundtable
More regulation for financial services firms will be the inevitable result of the recent crisis, according to panellists on a recent OpRisk & Compliance roundtable, Beyond the crisis: Transforming risk and compliance.
Speakers said there would be much more of a focus on processes, systems and controls. “If you look at the financial services arena, a lot of the risks and resulting events that have happened have been related to the operational risks and lack of controls, or lack of adherence to controls that were on paper but not in force,” said Avi Eyal, chief executive officer at Cura Software.
While speakers admitted it is early days in terms of what shape the new regulatory framework will take, they said there were some obvious areas supervisors would be focusing on. Improved corporate governance and transparency related to derivatives is one hot topic.
“I think there will be immediate heightened scrutiny on financial institutions and what they are doing,” said Scott Kwarta, director, professional and advisory services, at OpenPages. “The exact area where regulators are focusing might vary, but I think there are going to be many touch points. I think we are going to see greater focus in the credit area, as well as regulation around financial instruments and derivatives.” This will enable more transparency for users, and also for stakeholders in financial services firms, such as equity holders.
To view the webinar, click here
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
EU task force boss calls on NCAs to wield their powers to meet T+1
Europe’s disparity will add to command hub’s challenge to match US co-ordination feat, says Giovanni Sabatini
Vida portfolio solutions on J.P. Morgan Markets
J.P. Morgan’s Vida portfolio solutions are being applied across financing and portfolio management, reflecting a shift towards more scalable, integrated investment infrastructure
Crypto’s missing CROs
More than two-thirds of top crypto exchanges lack a chief risk officer, although the picture is changing
How AI agents can join the dots for risk managers
Citi risk expert outlines agentic AI tool that would pull together structured and unstructured data on trading and lending approvals to create single, unified view of risk
The interplay between liquidity and collateral
The evolution of financing solutions as institutional investors raise and preserve cash
Do banks still need to validate GenAI models?
Regulators carved out GenAI models from new risk guidance. Banks shouldn’t see this as a reason to stop validating them.
FSB warns of ‘circles of risks’ in bank risk transfer deals
Credit lines, portfolio financing and NAV facilities for private credit funds could rebound on banks
Barclays built a risk framework for GenAI from scratch
Eleven teams contribute to assessing generative AI use cases in a system that includes 35 controls