Power outages are fastest growing operational risk for business
Recent research suggests that power outages were the fastest growing cause of business disruption in 2006.
LONDON - Recent research, conducted by SunGard Availability Services, shows that power-related disruptions increased by more than 350% between 2005 and 2006, and accounted for 26% of customer disaster declarations (invocations), up from 7% in 2005.
Hardware failure, however, remains the leading cause of business disruption, covering almost half (48%) of SunGard’s customer invocations. Flooding and infrastructure-related invocations, such as air-conditioning faults and uninterrupted power supply (UPS) loss, were the third largest cause of business disruption.
“Computers are getting smaller but are much more powerful, and are increasingly drawing on firms’ infrastructure and local electricity suppliers for more and more power,” said Peter Coles, service delivery director at SunGard Availability Services. “As the demand for computing grows, the demand for power grows accordingly, and many companies are finding their existing buildings struggling to cope with this upsurge in power requirements. Listed or older office buildings cannot easily accommodate a ‘retrofit’ to suit current power needs, so careful consideration needs to be given to the limits of the infrastructure when planning for business availability. One option is to consider purpose-built data centre environments, such as those available from SunGard, which are built to deliver the optimum in resilience and uptime.”
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: EFG takes a bath for two decades of money laundering
Also: Deepfake voice clone cons Intesa division; key couple of cryptocurrency hacks. Data by ORX News
Managing risk to accelerate agentic AI value creation
Banks can accelerate agentic AI adoption by aligning each use case’s risks, controls and capabilities, enabling safe, accountable and value-driven deployment
One legal entity. Multiple IDs. Three business risks.
How fragmented entity IDs undermine risk, compliance and revenue decisions
An agentic bank? Not so fast
With no clear definition or way to gauge ROI, claims of AI adoption should be taken with a pinch of salt
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment
For enterprise risk, influence runs deeper than any veto
Risk Benchmarking study finds formal veto rights concentrated among the largest lenders, but used only as a last resort
Intraday pricing: fixed income’s next frontier
With firms looking to price fixed income securities on an intraday basis, specialist pricing providers such as LSEG help address cost, complexity and time-to-market challenges
Tech and data fragmentation irks enterprise risk managers
Risk Benchmarking: Often at the mercy of decisions made by other parts of the bank, ERM heads gripe at disparate systems, poor UX and reporting gaps