Delegation of banking supervision ‘a work in progress’, says CEBS
CEBS has released report on the process of delegation for the supervision of EU banks
LONDON – A new report from the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS) looks into the delegation of banking supervisory tasks. The paper provides insight into the current regulatory environment and areas for future potential progress.
The publication is in response to the Financial Services Committee’s Franq report, and its recommendations for supervisors to develop a delegation framework for supervisory tasks for the banking sector. Supervisors were requested to explore preconditions for delegation mechanisms, mostly through guidelines, and to test the arrangements.
The CEBS highlights two areas of delegation: in on-site communications (including model validations) it expects more progress to be made, except where legal or practical barriers persist; on liquidity concession models (or delegations including waivers of quantitative liquidity requirements), it says national regulatory and legal systems have established the necessary conditions for these waivers.
The publication defines the delegation of tasks, current legal situation and cases for delegation, in addition to possible future trends and general criteria for the delegation process. The report’s two annexes contain an in-depth look at current practices in the context of on-site communications and liquidity models.
The CEBS (and its two sister Level 3 committees) says it will begin work on delegation of supervision towards the end of this year, and that its current paper is to be regarded as a work in progress.
The paper can be downloaded from the following link.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Hopes, fears and ‘mass confusion’: the sudden end of SR 11-7
Banks welcome chance to prioritise model reviews, but fret over future policy changes and AI
Bootcamps and peer pressure: Goldman preps staff for AI future
Isda AGM: Tone from the top is not enough, says chief information officer Marco Argenti
In Iran war, VAR models ease cliff effect on Ice and CME margins
At 105%, EEX – using Span model – saw largest single-day jump compared with those CCPs
MRM: how banks are scaling models in the age of AI
MRM capabilities are evolving to ensure compliance while helping organisations retain a competitive edge
ALM in 2026: the fast-track from compliance to competitive edge
How banks are modernising asset-liability management for a more volatile world
Why AI-related conduct risk is reshaping the business agenda
Trust in AI-only approaches remains limited, and explainability is becoming critical to modern risk management
NeoClear enters battle for euro swaps clearing
Paris-based CCP to challenge Eurex and LCH with planned 2027 launch
Abaxx: meeting the need for new commodity derivatives
Abaxx revamps commodity hedging with a suite of modern contracts