2008 LDCE “under consideration”
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision to discuss a new loss data collection exercise at its next meeting in January
A new operational risk loss data collection exercise (LCDE) will be considered at the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s next meeting in January, according to Marco Moscadelli, senior analyst in banking supervision at the Bank of Italy and a member of the BCBS’s Accord Implementation Group.
Moscadelli, who was speaking at the OpRisk Middle East conference today in Dubai, noted the last global LDCE was conducted in 2001 and reported on by the Basel Committee in 2002. The US, Germany and a handful of other countries also conducted an LDCE in 2004, which was reported on in 2005. The new LDCE is expected to be global in scope, and could kick off as early as the first quarter of 2008 once it is approved.
LDCEs collect and compare loss data from banks in countries implementing Basel II, and were used to calibrate calculations for the various op risk approaches under the new Basel Accord when it was in development.
Moscadelli says the committee will discuss the “deliverables” of the LDCE for the banks themselves, including the format of the data input templates, and how the data will be processed and reported back to the industry.
Moscadelli also indicated there was a possibility that scenario analysis results will also be included in the LDCE, as many banks have been relying more on scenarios than on loss data in their op risk models.
Lastly, he said the LDCE would enable regulators to compare the data of advanced measurement approach candidates globally.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
The ECB’s geopolitical stress test needs a price
Only a market can say how much it should cost to insure against losses from a geopolitical risk event, and none exists, argues academic
Risk managers grapple with hazards and benefits of intraday repo
Expected increase in collateral velocity and re-use could also boost leverage and risk in markets
Repo tokens won’t be cleared. Or will they?
Uncertainty lingers over clearing status of tokenised Treasuries, with decision likely devolved to DTCC
Op risk data: Japanese restaurant payments firm swallows $700m loss
Also: Bank of Baroda fraud filing, Wells’ Ponzi woes, and Swedbank’s Panama Papers payout. Data by ORX News
ECB finds gaps in geopolitical stress-testing frameworks
Current methods fail to properly capture impact of geopolitical stress on liquidity
How internal reporting data can strengthen governance and risk oversight
Japan’s revised whistleblower regime provides an opportunity to strengthen internal reporting arrangements
Rapid-fire repo raises hopes of cheaper, faster trading
Tokenised Treasuries piloted by DTCC could squash settlement cycles and enable 24/7 repo
FCMs back CFTC proposal granting opt-out from CME oversight
New rules aim to address conflicts of interests at vertically integrated exchange groups