US rescue bill meets opposition in Congress
Markets wobble due to political wrangling concerning approval of the $700 billion rescue deal proposed by the Treasury last week
WASHINGTON, DC – Democrats have begun to voice their concerns over the $700 billion rescue deal thrashed out by the US Treasury last week in conjunction with the Federal Reserve and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Treasury secretary Henry Paulson submitted legislation to Congress requesting authority to purchase illiquid mortgage-related assets from financial institutions to promote market stability. Under the terms of the deal, the Treasury will have the authority to issue up to $700 billion of Treasury securities to finance the purchase of the assets. The treasury secretary will have the discretion, in consultation with the chairman of the Federal Reserve, to “purchase other assets, as deemed necessary to effectively stabilise financial markets”, but the authority to purchase expires two years from date of enactment.
Congressional Democrats are concerned the new deal gives too much power to the Treasury department and are calling for greater legislative oversight of the department, as well as more direct assistance for homeowners and limits on top bankers’ pay whose firms seek help.
Opponents of the plan have also raised concerns that the deal will be extended to include non-US financial institutions. The legislation states that, for banks to qualify for the programme, “assets must have been originated or issued on or before September 17, 2008,” and that “participating financial institutions must have significant operations in the US, unless the secretary makes a determination, in consultation with the chairman of the Federal Reserve, that broader eligibility is necessary to effectively stabilise financial markets.”
This ambiguity, and the Congressional opposition, caused shares to fall in London as traders doubted whether non-US institutions would be included in the deal.
Paulson continues to push for a resolution by this Friday. However, some lawmakers baulk at the idea of rushing into approving such extraordinary new powers for the Treasury secretary.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Op risk data: EFG takes a bath for two decades of money laundering
Also: Deepfake voice clone cons Intesa division; key couple of cryptocurrency hacks. Data by ORX News
Managing risk to accelerate agentic AI value creation
Banks can accelerate agentic AI adoption by aligning each use case’s risks, controls and capabilities, enabling safe, accountable and value-driven deployment
One legal entity. Multiple IDs. Three business risks.
How fragmented entity IDs undermine risk, compliance and revenue decisions
An agentic bank? Not so fast
With no clear definition or way to gauge ROI, claims of AI adoption should be taken with a pinch of salt
BIS’s Hernández de Cos on AI, non-bank risk and tokenisation
General manager talks about how the BIS is navigating a complex global environment
For enterprise risk, influence runs deeper than any veto
Risk Benchmarking study finds formal veto rights concentrated among the largest lenders, but used only as a last resort
Intraday pricing: fixed income’s next frontier
With firms looking to price fixed income securities on an intraday basis, specialist pricing providers such as LSEG help address cost, complexity and time-to-market challenges
Tech and data fragmentation irks enterprise risk managers
Risk Benchmarking: Often at the mercy of decisions made by other parts of the bank, ERM heads gripe at disparate systems, poor UX and reporting gaps