
US rescue bill meets opposition in Congress
Daily news headlines
WASHINGTON, DC – Democrats have begun to voice their concerns over the $700 billion rescue deal thrashed out by the US Treasury last week in conjunction with the Federal Reserve and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Treasury secretary Henry Paulson submitted legislation to Congress requesting authority to purchase illiquid mortgage-related assets from financial institutions to promote market stability. Under the terms of the deal, the Treasury will have the authority to issue up to $700 billion of Treasury securities to finance the purchase of the assets. The treasury secretary will have the discretion, in consultation with the chairman of the Federal Reserve, to “purchase other assets, as deemed necessary to effectively stabilise financial markets”, but the authority to purchase expires two years from date of enactment.
Congressional Democrats are concerned the new deal gives too much power to the Treasury department and are calling for greater legislative oversight of the department, as well as more direct assistance for homeowners and limits on top bankers’ pay whose firms seek help.
Opponents of the plan have also raised concerns that the deal will be extended to include non-US financial institutions. The legislation states that, for banks to qualify for the programme, “assets must have been originated or issued on or before September 17, 2008,” and that “participating financial institutions must have significant operations in the US, unless the secretary makes a determination, in consultation with the chairman of the Federal Reserve, that broader eligibility is necessary to effectively stabilise financial markets.”
This ambiguity, and the Congressional opposition, caused shares to fall in London as traders doubted whether non-US institutions would be included in the deal.
Paulson continues to push for a resolution by this Friday. However, some lawmakers baulk at the idea of rushing into approving such extraordinary new powers for the Treasury secretary.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Climate risk overlays unnerve model-validation teams
Risk Live: Model risk managers fear they lack the data or skills to properly test expert judgement
Clearing members combing rule books after LME lawsuit win
Industry debates whether other CCPs and exchanges would cancel trades if faced with similar crisis
Interest rate and liquidity risk special report 2023
This special report explores the ongoing impact of higher interest rates on bank capital and liquidity, and the steps they are taking to shore up their liquidity risk management practices in the current environment.
How higher interest rates are affecting bank liquidity
A panel of industry experts discusses the challenges posed to banks’ capital and liquidity by a persistently higher interest rate environment. They also share insights on adapting their liquidity risk management strategies, tools and technologies for a…
Hard concentration: clearing members want clarity from CCPs
FCMs complain they struggle to pass opaque margin calculations through to end-clients
Markets Technology Awards 2024: Fixes for the ‘forgotten middle’
Vendors spy opportunity in demystifying and democratising – opening up markets and methods to new users
Buy side still prefers bilateral repo despite LCH margin update
New model will cut margin faster after stresses abate, but costs still high for directional trades
Margin failings raise concern over Treasury basis trade
Opaque models at clearing houses cast doubt on calculations for concentration add-on