FSA consults on new liquidity rules
The UK regulator has issued a consultation paper on liquidity risk requirements for financial services that follows recommendations made by the Basel Committee
The proposed rules are largely based on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's 'Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision' but they also take into account the difficulties faced in the market over the past 18 months.
While it remains the responsibility of firms' senior management to adopt a sound approach to liquidity risk management, the FSA proposes the following:
•A new, quantitative framework for liquidity risk management that places greater emphasis on firms' ability to assess liquidity risks and develop policies to tackle them;
•A strengthened qualitative framework for liquidity risk management, with an increased focus on firms' stress testing and contingency funding plans;
•New liquidity reporting requirements; and
•A new approach to firms operating in the UK that are part of a wider UK or international group.
The measures proposed in the paper are designed to enhance firms' liquidity risk management practices and the FSA hopes they will reshape business models over the coming years. They are also structured to enhance the FSA's ability to monitor and supervise firms' liquidity risk exposures.
"We are pleased with the way in which the industry has engaged with us on this issue," says Paul Sharma, director of wholesale and prudential policy at the FSA. "We have put forward a robust set of proposals that we believe will greatly improve firms' ability to deal with liquidity risks, and thereby increase the overall stability of the UK financial markets. This builds on the international work on liquidity that is currently in train."
The consultation period closes on March 4, 2009. The FSA hopes to introduce the new rules in October 2009.
The FSA is also pre-consulting on the reporting requirements for the new liquidity regime. The consultation period runs for a month and the FSA will then look to issue a separate paper in the first quarter of 2009.
Click here for the full consultation paper.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
We’re gonna need a bigger board: geopolitical risk takes centre stage
As threats multiply, responsibility for geopolitical risk is shifting to ERM teams
At BNY, a risk-centric approach to GenAI
Centralised platform allows bank to focus on risk management, governance and, not least, talent in its AI build
CROs shoulder climate risk load, but bigger org picture is murky
Dedicated teams vary wildly in size, while ownership is shared among risk, sustainability and the business
‘The models are not bloody wrong’: a storm in climate risk
Risk.net’s latest benchmarking exercise shows banks confronting decades-long exposures, while grappling with political headwinds, limited resources and data gaps
Climate Risk Benchmarking: explore the data
View interactive charts from Risk.net’s 43-bank study, covering climate governance, physical and transition risks, stress-testing, technology, and regulation
ISITC’s Paul Fullam on the ‘anxiety’ over T+1 in Europe
Trade processing chair blames budget constraints, testing and unease over operational risk ahead of settlement move
Cyber insurance premiums dropped unexpectedly in 2025
Competition among carriers drives down premiums, despite increasing frequency and severity of attacks