Driving shareholder value using Six Sigma
Six Sigma methodology could and should be applied to operational risk management processes immediately, writes John Kiddy CEO of Chase Cooper
SIX SIGMA is in essence a structured methodology to systematically improve processes by eliminating defects. The ideas and practices came out of manufacturing in the mid-1980s and have been reported as having generated many billions of dollars in shareholder value.
There has been a debate for some time about whether Six Sigma methodology (or a variant) can be applied to financial institutions, and in particular whether it should be an integral part of an op risk management programme. The recent survey on Six Sigma conducted by OR&C and Chase Cooper (see page 24) confirms the topicality of the subject. The global respondents represented all the major segments of the financial services industry, 70% of whom represented organisations with total assets of more than $1 billion.
The survey showed a degree of scepticism around the extent to which a structured methodology such as Six Sigma could be applied to financial institutions, although contradictorily, there was a high degree of acceptance - over 90% - that process improvement is an integral part of the op risk cycle.
For example, 64% of respondents felt the benefits of a formal methodology could be implemented in the financial services industry 'to some extent', and 65% felt there was 'some benefit' from a regulatory perspective in applying Six Sigma methodology.
In our view, just because the principles and application of Six Sigma were developed within a manufacturing environment, it does not necessarily follow that it is more suited to that industry than the financial services industry. Much of the debate has focused on whether Six Sigma can be used effectively by financial institutions, the implication being that the usage within manufacturing is the 'gold standard' and financial institutions can perhaps utilise some of these practices.
We believe the debate should be turned on its head.
We believe that not only can financial institutions utilise Six Sigma methodology, but that they are in fact more suited to Six Sigma than manufacturing companies.
Consider the facets of a manufacturing company. Its capacity is limited by natural resources. If it needs to increase production it needs to institute a whole series of measures - hire new people, buy more raw materials, attract more customers, build new factories etc. In addition, although cases of defective processes cost time and money, they generally only impact shareholder value after a period of time has elapsed.
Contrast this with financial institutions. A financial institution can increase the velocity and volume of its trading activity almost instantaneously. A team of traders with dealing screens, dealer-boards and trading authorisations can transact business in varying types of instruments theoretically without limitation, and certainly in volumes many, many times a financial institution's capital. The trading is not constrained by the necessity to build new factories, by any lead time, nor even by the necessity to have new customers, and if a financial institution operates a hedge fund they are not even constrained entirely by how much capital they have.
In addition, these institutions operate in a strict regulatory environment, with regulatory powers to either suspend activities, impose huge fines or a combination of both. History has demonstrated that during times of increased uncertainty, risk and volatility, trading volume often increases. The positive correlation between unexpected increases in trading volume and volatility has been well researched and documented by, among others, the Bank for International Settlements.
The effective design and operation of controls, as well as the effective identification and evaluation of risks, is clearly critical to the ability of a firm to generate sustainable revenues. We would argue that many of the processes that underly the effectiveness of controls are more critical to a financial institution than almost any process a manufacturing company is likely to have.
There are certain processes and controls within a financial institution that must operate consistently and are mission-critical to the protection of the firm, for example total compliance with AML rules.
Once an institution identifies its key risks, critical controls and the processes that underly their effectiveness, a formal structured methodology such as Six Sigma is exactly aligned to ensuring that these critical processes operate 100% of the time.
The Barings debacle happened because of a variety of defects that are out of scope of this article and well documented elsewhere, but what is clear is that a number of critical controls and processes did not operate properly, for example an effective reconciliation of margin calls with market position independent of the trading room could not have occurred. The point is, it had to occur.
Six Sigma methodology can be directly applied to processes in financial institutions, partly to reduce expected losses and make a financial institution more efficient, but also, and more importantly, in helping to prevent unexpected and catastrophic losses.
Once we get away from thinking about what parts of Six Sigma methodology used in manufacturing can be applied to financial institutions, and think from the standpoint of how do we apply structured methodology such as Six Sigma directly, without translation or constraint, to critical processes and controls within financial institutions, then what is clear in our view is that Six Sigma can be applied to the ORM process immediately. The tools exist (Chase Cooper has developed many of them already) and OR departments don't have to wait for loss data. OR departments can drive the agenda on process improvement and be seen and valued as critical to the objectives of the business.
About Chase Cooper Ltd Chase Cooper is a rapidly expanding risk management solutions provider, applying an innovative approach to risk management. Focusing on the financial sector, it provides unique all round solutions for Enterprise Wide Operational Risk, incorporating leading frameworks such as Basel II, COSO, FERMA, SOX. Its visionary software solution aCCelerate is a combination of a highly effective modern architecture providing a market leading user intuitive approach to risk management, supported by a unique combination of consulting services, resourcing and training. Based in the UK its risk management solutions are used by many of the world's leading financial institutions. |
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Buy side would welcome more guidance on managing margin calls
FSB report calls for regulators to review existing standards for non-bank liquidity management
Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites
Isda AGM: All in-scope banks opt for standardised approach to market risk; Nomura eyes IMA in 2025
Benchmark switch leaves hedging headache for Philippine banks
If interest rates are cut before new benchmark docs are ready, banks face possible NII squeeze
Op risk data: Tech glitch gives customers unlimited funds
Also: Payback for slow Paycheck Protection payouts; SEC hits out at AI washing. Data by ORX News
The American way: a stress-test substitute for Basel’s IRRBB?
Bankers divided over new CCAR scenario designed to bridge supervisory gap exposed by SVB failure
Industry warns CFTC against rushing to regulate AI for trading
Vote on workplan pulled amid calls to avoid duplicating rules from other regulatory agencies
Top 10 op risks: change brings challenges as banks splash the cash
Higher interest margins and a trend toward insourcing drive major tech projects
Top 10 op risks: deepfakes drive rise in fraud fears
External fraud re-enters top 10 as artificial intelligence provides new tools for criminals
Most read
- Top 10 operational risks for 2024
- Top 10 op risks: third parties stoke cyber risk
- Japanese megabanks shun internal models as FRTB bites