FSA guidance framework in force from today
Principles-based regulations gets a boost from FSA authorised industry guidance
The UK Financial Services Authority’s (FSA's) new framework for recognising industry guidance comes into effect today. This is viewed as a critical factor in the move towards principles-based regulation.
Trade associations, professional bodies and firms will now be able to seek formal confirmation from the FSA for guidance they give to members to help them better understand and comply with the FSA’s regulatory requirements.
FSA director of strategy and risk Verena Ross says: “Trade associations and others have for many years provided guidance on regulatory matters for their members. This new formalised system involving FSA confirmation will contribute towards the move to principles-based regulation, allowing us to focus on the main principles to be achieved. Industry guidance will give firms help and advice on ways of complying with FSA principles and high-level rules, in a way that should not only stimulate flexibility and innovation but also tailor the advice to different sectors.”
A policy statement describes the role of industry guidance and the FSA’s expectations. It also sets out the process for bodies to follow in seeking FSA confirmation for particular sets of industry guidance and describes the confirmation criteria the FSA has set up to ensure confirmation requests are dealt with consistently, efficiently and effectively.
The paper makes clear, however, that industry guidance will supplement FSA rules and not replace them, and that the FSA will continue to produce guidance where required. The paper also clarifies that the FSA will not take action against a firm that has complied with recognised guidance covering the issue concerned.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
What futures and options say about the cost of war
Spot prices reveal major disruption, futures indicate this will pass, options imply ongoing instability
CME-FICC cross-netting terms fuel clashes
Hedge funds worried by CCP powers to suspend arrangement; clearing members say it’s standard practice
For collateral, can TINA become TIA?
US Treasuries’ dominance as collateral in repo and derivatives is no longer set in stone, argues economist
A Hormuz tipping point may be days away
Agent-based model suggests delays and shortages likely to accelerate after four weeks
Op risk data: HK gets tough on takeover in $200m takedown
Also: Bank staff steal state funds in India; Vanguard settles US net zero lawsuit. Data by ORX News
CRO view: Emerging risks in the age of AI
The risk agenda is shifting beyond market and credit volatility towards operational resilience, AI governance and culture
Interest rate crosswinds buffet IRRBB teams
Political intervention and rapid-fire law changes are skewering bank models for forecasting cashflows
FRTB internal models: quo vadis?
Two risk experts explore how to adjust the FRTB framework to promote internal model usage