Carbon credit rating services launched
IDEAcarbon launches first carbon credit rating service
LONDON – The Carbon Rating Agency, a new company formed by IDEAcarbon, has launched the first carbon credit rating service today at the London Stock Exchange in London.
The service will provide detailed credit ratings for carbon offset in the clean development mechanism (CDM), joint implementation (JI) and voluntary markets. Project-based mechanisms such as CDM and JI were created by the Kyoto Protocol to encourage investment in carbon-sensitive projects in developing countries. The rating service plans to analyse these emissions-reducing schemes and assess whether they are likely to achieve their stated targets.
Lord Stern, author of the influential Stern report on the economics of climate change and vice-chairman of IDEAglobal Group, attended the launch to lend his support to the scheme. “The carbon markets are showing their potential to reduce global emissions and should form a key plank for any future global climate agreement. If we are to attract the levels of finance necessary to make this a mainstream market and have a strong impact on emissions reduction, risks must be clearly understood, articulated and managed. A detailed ratings system is a vital tool to bring greater clarity, transparency and certainty to the market.”
Ian Johnson, chair of the Carbon Rating Agency and previously at the World Bank, introduced the service, stating that the carbon markets are “absolutely destined to be much larger”. He expects the market will be valued easily at €100 billion by 2020. His hope is that the provision of a ratings service for green energy and emission-reducing projects will increase investment, and help to establish carbon as a true asset and a real financial market through increased transparency and better risk management, while promoting a deeper understanding of the operational element of these projects.
There are 25 CDM projects rated in the initial portfolio, but the Agency aims to add up to 10 a month from July 2008. Once it has a substantial number in its portfolio, it hopes to establish benchmarks against sectors and comparable projects.
Like existing rating agencies, the projects are rated from triple A, for the highest quality with the lowest risk offset assets, to D for the highest risk assets that are least likely to meet their stated goals. The report accompanying the launch revealed that few of the projects achieve AA ratings and a large proportion is liable to under-perform compared with volumes projected at the project design stage. Each rating provides a detailed analysis of a wide range of risks to project performance, including implementation risk, which is often overlooked.
The Carbon Rating Agency will provide ratings to market participants on a mandated basis or through the Agency’s Market Initiated Rating Services, which gives subscribers ongoing access to a representative range of carbon assets. The Agency’s management team and ratings committee includes ratings experts, financial market professionals, UN climate change negotiators and former senior managers from development agencies such as the World Bank – a combination that ensures the broad range of risks facing carbon projects are taken into account by the ratings process.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
CME aims to offer client UST cross-margining internally in 2027
CCP has filed initial proposal with SEC; wants to offer more products than joint FICC programme
Manuela Veloso on how banks can make their AI dreams reality
Former JP Morgan head of AI research says open-ended enquiry will unlock technology’s full potential
The ECB’s geopolitical stress test needs a price
Only a market can say how much it should cost to insure against losses from a geopolitical risk event, and none exists, argues academic
Risk managers grapple with hazards and benefits of intraday repo
Expected increase in collateral velocity and re-use could also boost leverage and risk in markets
Repo tokens won’t be cleared. Or will they?
Uncertainty lingers over clearing status of tokenised Treasuries, with decision likely devolved to DTCC
Op risk data: Japanese restaurant payments firm swallows $700m loss
Also: Bank of Baroda fraud filing, Wells’ Ponzi woes, and Swedbank’s Panama Papers payout. Data by ORX News
ECB finds gaps in geopolitical stress-testing frameworks
Current methods fail to properly capture impact of geopolitical stress on liquidity
How internal reporting data can strengthen governance and risk oversight
Japan’s revised whistleblower regime provides an opportunity to strengthen internal reporting arrangements